摘要
学生成长过程中的文化冲突是教育社会学领域的老问题。对此问题,既有研究至少提供了两大经典理论路径,即福柯、布迪厄等人的结构主义理论路径和威利斯的后结构主义理论路径。这两大路径在视角上各有侧重,所见随之也大不相同。理解本土当代学生成长过程中的文化冲突时,它们均可以派得上用场。但如果试图更深入地理解本土学生的文化冲突体验,仍需另外寻找合适概念,而可行的策略便是尽量使用本土学生自己的语言,或从本土学生的文化冲突体验中提取合适概念。
The issue of cultural conflicts in the process of students' growth has been of long-term research interest in educational sociology. To the present, there have been two classical research paths: Structuralism by researchers such as Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu, and Post structuralism with Paul Willis as the scholastic representative. These two paths, with their respective research focuses and consequent viewpoints, can be both applied to understanding the cultural conflict(s) in the growth of domestic students. However, sets of more suitable concepts are needed when more attempts are made to obtain a deeper understanding of the domestic students' experience in cultural conflict(s). A suggested strategy is to use as much the expression by domestic students as possible, or to develop these suitable concepts from the domestic students ' experience in cultural conflict(s).
出处
《教育学术月刊》
北大核心
2016年第1期71-74,共4页
Education Research Monthly
关键词
学生成长
文化冲突
结构主义
后结构主义
student growth
cultural conflict
Structuralism
post structuralism