期刊文献+

知识产权调查引致的贸易壁垒:一个统计分析 被引量:2

Trade Barrier Caused by Intellectual Property Investigation: A Statistical Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,由于信息不对称和诉讼双方地位不对等,打着维护公平贸易旗号的知识产权调查已经异化为一种新型的贸易壁垒。利用美国国际贸易委员会337调查数据库,从案件总量、涉案来源地、调查类型、涉案产业、判决结果五个方面对知识产权调查做一个全面考察。发现:调查主要集中在机电产品的专利侵权方面;调查的主要来源地是中国大陆、中国台湾和日本;较高的和解和同意令比例意味着原告发起知识产权诉讼很可能是希望起到贸易威慑或被动和解的"敲竹杠"效应。 In recent years, due to the asymmetric information and the status of the two parties, the intellectual property investi- gation under the banner of maintaining fair trade has become a new type of trade barrier. We use 337 survey database of USITC to do a comprehensive study in such aspects as the total number of cases, the respondent area of origin, the type of investigation, the industry involved, and the settlement of cases. Statistics show that the investigations were mainly concentrated on the patent infringement of mechanical and electrical products, and that the main respondent areas of origin were China mainland, Taiwan and Japan. Furthermore, higher percentage of settlement and consent order means that the plaintiff is likely to obtain a trade deterrent or a "rip-off" effect.
作者 代中强
出处 《集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2016年第1期30-40,共11页 Journal of Jimei University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303092) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(13YJCZH026) 福建省高校杰出青年科研人才培育计划项目(JA13170S)
关键词 知识产权 337调查 贸易壁垒 intellectual property 337 Investigation trade barrier
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1ABLONDI I H, VENT H H. Section 337 import inves- tigations - unfair import practices [ J ]. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 1981, 4 (1): 27-42.
  • 2ROGERS J W, WHITLOCK J P. Is section 337 con- sistent with the GArI~ and the TRIPs agreement? [ J ]. American University International Law Review, 2002, 17 (3) : 459 -525.
  • 3KOPPIKAR V. Evaluating the international trade com- mission's section 337 investigation [ J]. Journal of the Patent &Trademark Office Society, 2004, 86 (2): 432 - 440.
  • 4HAHN R W, SINGER H J. Assessing bias in patent infringement eases: a review of international trade com- mission decisions [ J ]. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2008, 21 (2): 458-508.
  • 5HECKENDOM J H, VANDER SCHAAF L B. Graymarket trademark infringement actions at the U, S. in- ternational trade commission: the benefits of the forum and analysis of relevant cases [J]. The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 2009, 8 (2): 271 - 289.
  • 6HNATH G M. Section 337 investigations at the US in- ternational trade commission provide a powerful remedy against misappropriation of trade secrets [ J ]. Intellec- tual Property & Technology Law Journal, 2010, 22 (6) : 1 -7.
  • 7STEME R G, WRIGHT J E, GORDON L A, PICK- ARD B L. Reexamination practice with concurrent dis- trict court litigation or section 337 USITC investigations [ C]. The Sedona Conference, 2011.
  • 8郑秉秀.国际贸易中的知识产权壁垒[J].国际贸易问题,2002(5):26-30. 被引量:47
  • 9曹世华.国际贸易中的知识产权壁垒及其战略应对[J].财贸经济,2006,27(6):59-61. 被引量:20
  • 10吴郁秋,刘海云.知识产权保护差异与贸易摩擦诱发机制——基于利益集团视角的分析[J].国际贸易问题,2009(5):105-112. 被引量:14

二级参考文献43

共引文献109

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部