期刊文献+

洛文斯顿作业治疗用认知评定量表在脑外伤早期患者认知功能评定中的效能 被引量:22

Efficacy of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment in Evaluating Cognitive Function after Traumatic Brain Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨洛文斯顿作业治疗用认知评定量表(LOTCA)评定颅脑外伤早期患者认知功能的效能。方法 2013年1月~2014年10月收治的脑外伤患者72例为损伤组,与损伤组年龄、性别、受教育年限匹配的健康人30名为健康组。采用LOTCA及简易精神状态检查(MMSE)进行评定。结果 MMSE总分与LOTCA总分正相关(r=0.56,P〈0.01)。损伤组LOTCA各分项评分均明显低于健康组(P〈0.01),其中定向、视运动组织、思维运作能力受损更严重。损伤组LOTCA定向力、视运动组织、思维运作、注意力中重度损伤人数明显多于健康组,其中思维运作更突出。接受者操作曲线(ROC)下面积,LOTCA为(0.84±0.04),小于MMSE的(0.91±0.03)(P〈0.05)。结论脑外伤患者有较全面认知损伤,其中知觉损伤较少,思维运作损伤偏多。LOTCA判定脑外伤后认知障碍的效能不如MMSE。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery for patients at the early stage of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods 72 patients with TBI hospitalized from January, 2013 to October, 2014 and 30 healthy controls matched gender, age and educational background were assessed with the Chinese version of LOTCA battery and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) respectively. Results The score of MMSE and LOTCA were correlated (r=0.56, P〈0.01). Compared with the controls, the scores of all the subtests of LOTCA decreased (P〈0.0 l) in the patients, especially the orientation, visuomo- tot organization and thinking operation; with the more incidence of medium and serious dysfunction of all the subtests of LOTCA except perception (P〈0.01), in which thinking operation was the most and attention was the least. The area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) was (0.84+0.04) in LOTCA, less than that of (0.91±0.03) in MMSE (P〈0.05). Conclusion Cognition is widely impaired in patients after TBI, most involved thinking operation. LOTCA is less effective to identify cognitive dysfunction than MMSE, and can be used as an al- ternation or a supplement.
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期84-87,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 洛文斯顿作业治疗用认知评定量表 简易精神状态检查 脑外伤 认知障碍 评定 效能 Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment Mini-Mental State Examination traumatic brain injury cognitive impairment assessment efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1AKatz N, Itzkovich M, Averbuch S, et al. Loewenstein Occupa- tional Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: reliability and validity [J]. Am J Occup Ther, 1989, 43(3): 184-192.
  • 2Cermak SA, Katz N, McGuire E, et al. Performance of Ameri- cans and Israelis with cerebrovascular accident on the Loewen- stein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOT- CA) [J]. Am J Occup Ther, 1995, 49(6): 500-506.
  • 3Su CY, Chen WL, Tsai PC, et al. Psychometric properties of the Loewenstien Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment-Sec- ond Edition in Taiwan Residents persons with schizophrenia [J]. Am J Occup Ther, 2007, 61(1): 108-118.
  • 4Jang Y, Chem JS, Lin KC. Validity of the Loewenstein Occupa- tional Therpy Cognitive Assessment in people with intellectualdisabilities [J]. Am J Occup Ther, 2009, 63(4): 414-422.
  • 5Wang SY, Gong ZK, Sen J, et al. The usefulness of the Loewen- stein Occupational Therpy Cognitive Assessment in evaluating cognitive function in patients with stroke [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacoi Sci, 2014, 18(23): 3665-3672.
  • 6Josman N, Abdallah TM, Edgel-Yeger B. Using the LOTCA to measure cultural and sociodemographic effects on cognitive cultural and sociodemographic effects on cognitive skills in two groups of children [J]. Am J Occup Ther, 2011, 65(3): 29-37.
  • 7燕铁斌,马超,郭友华,黄利荣.Loewenstein认知评定量表(简体中文版)的效度及信度研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2004,26(2):81-84. 被引量:108
  • 8张善纲,范建中,陈平雁,张建宏,尹瑞雪.洛文斯顿作业疗法认知评定中文量表信度和内在效度的初步研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2004,26(9):530-534. 被引量:31
  • 9Bruns J Jr, Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain in- jury [J]. Epilepsia, 2003, 44(10): 2-10.
  • 10张皓,张小年,山磊,王晓艳,孙新亭.脑外伤患者认知障碍的特点及康复疗效分析[J].中国康复,2010,25(2):90-92. 被引量:26

二级参考文献28

  • 1杨湘华,王晓莉.针灸配合语言训练治疗失语症病人效果观察[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2004,19(15):30-31. 被引量:9
  • 2何成松,李卫平,杨大鉴.脑外伤患者的认知训练[J].中国康复,2004,19(4):242-242. 被引量:14
  • 3纪树荣,恽小平,陈巍,郭华珍.LOTCA认知功能的成套测验[J].现代康复,1999,3(7):770-771. 被引量:17
  • 4山鸟重.神经心理学入门[M].东京都:医学书院,1985.184-186.
  • 5重野幸次 土肥信之 等.失用症.精神机能评价[M].东京都:医齿药出版株式会社,1993.228.
  • 6江藤文夫.高级脑机能检查法-失用、失认、失语的本态和诊断[M].东京都:医齿药出版株式会社,1995.225.
  • 7沈渔 主编.精神病学:第三版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1980.298-301.
  • 8Bruns J Jr,Hauser WA.The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury[J].Epilepsia,2003,44(10):2-10.
  • 9Demir SO,Altinok N,Aydin G,et al.Functional and cognitive progress in aphasic patients with traumatic brain injury during post-acute phase[J].Brain Inj,2006,20:1383-1390.
  • 10Ozbudak Demir S,Grgülü G,et al.Comparison of rehabilitation outcome in patients with aphasic and non-aphasic traumatic brain injury[J].J Rehabil Med,2006,38:68-71.

共引文献329

同被引文献231

引证文献22

二级引证文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部