期刊文献+

表面羧基化对聚合物微气泡性能的影响

Influence of Carboxyl Modification on the Surface of Polymer Microbubbles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨左旋聚乳酸(PLLA)及聚乙烯醇(PVA)为膜材的聚合物微气泡表面羧基化,对其形貌、粒径、稳定性及超声成像性能的影响。方法:首先对PVA膜材进行了羧基化修饰,通过红外光谱进行羧基化程度的表征。然后用羧基化前、后的PVA为原料分别制备了聚合物微气泡,光学显微镜及扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察微气泡形貌,Zeta电位检测微气泡表面电荷特性,并对羧基化前后的微气泡进行体外超声成像实验。结果:羧基化不会显著影响微气泡的粒径,但会改变其表面结构,形成诸多凹陷;Zeta电位检测表明,羧基的引入使微气泡的表面电荷向负电性移动,微气泡羧基化之后能够显著增强超声成像效果,延长超声成像时间。结论:羧基的引入既由于静电斥力提高了微气泡的稳定性,又可赋予其耦联其他活性物质的能力,并可显著增强其超声成像效果。本研究为微气泡的生物医学应用打下了良好的基础。 Objective:To explore the influence of carboxylation on the surface of polymer MBs which made up of poly l-lactic acid and polyvinyl alcohol(PVA)on the morphology,size,stability and ultrasound imaging.Method:Firstly,the PVA was modified by carboxyl and the degree of PVA carboxylation was characterized by infrared spectroscopy.The polymer MBs were prepared by using PVA before and after carboxylation.The morphology of MBs were observed by optical microscope and scanning electron microscope.The unique electric charge characteristics of MBs surface were detected by Zeta potential detection.Finally,the ultrasound imaging experiments in vitro with MBs were performed before and after carboxyl.Result:Carboxylation didn't affect particle size but affect morphology signally and changed the structure on the surface such as the formulation of hollows.Zeta potential detection indicated carboxylation made the surface charge of MBs move to electronegative place.Carboxylation could signally enhance the effect and extend the time of ultrasonic imaging after carboxyl.Conclusion:The introduction of carboxyl give MBs the ability of coupling other active substances as well as enhancing the stability of MBs because of electrostatic repulsion.It can also signally enhance the effect of ultrasonic imaging.This study lay a good foundation for the biomedical application of MBs.
机构地区 南京医科大学
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2015年第33期7-10,共4页 Medical Innovation of China
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金支持(61401217) 江苏省大学生创新训练基金项目支持(201510312046Y)
关键词 微气泡 聚合物 超声成像 Microbubble Polymer Ultrasound imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Tsao S K,Tsao J.P2B-1 estimation of tissue attenuation coefficients using contrast agent[C].IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium,2006,57(6):1572-1575.
  • 2Shan S F,Zhi Y R,Yuan L W,et al.Synthesis and application of hollow magnetic graphitic carbon microspheres with/without Ti O2nanoparticle layer on the surface[J].Chemical Communications,2010,46(34):6276-6278.
  • 3Wheatleya M A,Forsberg F,Oum K,et al.Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acoustic response of a novel 50:50 PLGA contrast agent[J].Ultrasonics,2006,44(4):360-367.
  • 4Straub J A,Chickering D E,Church C C,et al.Porous PLGA microparticles:AI-700,an intravenously administered ultrasound contrast agent for use in echocardiography[J].J Control Release,2005,108(1):21-32.
  • 5Chlon C,Guedon C,Verhaagen B,et al.Effect of molecular weight,crystallinity,and hydrophobicity on the acoustic activation of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents[J].Biomacromolecules,2009,10(5):1025-1031.
  • 6Ferrara K,Pollard R,Borden M.Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents:fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery[J].Ann Rev Biomed Eng,2007,9(9):415-447.
  • 7Hernot S,Klibanov A L.Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery[J].Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews,2008,60(10):1153-1166.
  • 8Tinkov S,Bekeredjian R,Winter G,et al.Microbubbles as ultrasound triggered drug carriers[J].J Pharm Sci,2009,98(6):1935-1961.
  • 9Kooiman K,Vos H J,Versluis M,et al.Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery[J].Adv Drug Delivery Rev,2014,72(15):28-48.
  • 10Mulder W J,Koole R,Brandwijk R J,et al.Quantum dots with a paramagnetic coating as a bimodal molecular imaging probe[J].Nano Lett,2006,6(1):1-6.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Tural B, Ozenbas M, Atalay S, et al. Rapid synthesis and characterization of maghemite nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2008: 8 :861 -866.
  • 2Jun YW, Seo JW, Cheon J. Nanosealing laws of magnetic nanoparticles and their applicabilities in biomedical sciences. Acc Chem Res,2008,41 : 179-189.
  • 3Jun YW, Lee JH, Cheon J. Chemical design of nanoparticle probes for high-performance magnetic resonance imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl,2008,47:5122-5135.
  • 4Ao M, Wang Z, Ran H, et al. Gd DTPA-loaded PLGA microbubbles as both ultrasound contrast agent and MRI contrast agent-a feasibility research. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2010,93 : 551-556.
  • 5Liu Z, Lammers T, Ehling J, et al. Iron oxide nanoparticle- containing microbubble composites as contrast agents for MR and ultrasound dual-modality imaging. Biomaterials, 2011,32: 6155-6163.
  • 6Orsi F, Arnone P, Chen W, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation:a new therapeutic option for solid tumors. J Cancer Res Ther,2010, 6 : 414-4211.
  • 7Perez J M,O'Loughin T,Simeone F J,et al.DNA-based magnetic nanoparticle assembly acts as a magnetic relaxation nanoswitch allowing screening of DNA-cleaving agents[J].Am Chem Soc,2002,124(12):2856.
  • 8金茂俊,邵华,金芬,等.基于磁性纳米粒子的免疫分析方法在食品安全检测中的研究进展[C]//2012中国食品与农产品质量安全监测技术应用国际论坛.北京,2012:32.
  • 9Elaissari,Chauvet,Halle.Effect of charge nature on the adsorption of single-stranded DNA fragments onto latex particles[J].J Colloid Interf Sci,1998,202(2):251.
  • 10Jhunu Chatterjee,Yousef Haik,Ching-Jen Chen.Modification and characterization of polystyrene-based magnetic microspheres and comparison with albumin-based magnetic microspheres[J].J Magn Magn Mater,2001,225(1-2):21.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部