期刊文献+

对国内排舞文献中若干问题的探讨 被引量:1

Discussion of Domestic Literature on Line Dance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对国内排舞文献中存在的若干观点提出质疑。提出并讨论了5个问题:排舞作品是否必须得到"国际排舞协会"的认证?排舞的舞谱是否一定要通过网络公开传播?舞者们在音乐响起时就一定能执行相同的舞步?按照芭蕾舞的方位规定排舞的点位是否适宜?排舞是否仅对舞者的下肢进行了动作规定?结论:编舞可在线发表采用排舞术语创编的作品而无需认证;以提高学生解决问题能力的团队创编作品无需公开传播;同一首音乐或歌曲也能被创编出多支排舞;应按照虚拟水平放置的时钟指向规定排舞的点位;随着排舞的发展,对舞者躯干及上肢进行动作规定的作品正不断涌现。 The following issues were discussed in the paper: Whether choreography must be certified by the "International line Dance Association"? Whether line dance step sheets must be published through the network? The dancers whether executing the same steps at the same time when the music starts? Whether based on ballet define the direction of line dance? Describe the patterns whether only for the lower limbs? Conclusion: Choreographer's works can be published online without certification; Works to improve students' ability to solve problems do not have published ; Sometimes a popular song will have multiple differ- ent line dances; The direction of a step may be defined by points of the clock; With the development of line dance, many works have been described the torso and upper limb movements.
作者 唐晓义
出处 《体育科学研究》 2016年第1期42-46,共5页 Sports Science Research
基金 中国科学院大学校长基金(Y25102NN00)
关键词 排舞 文献 质疑 line dance literature questioning
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献29

共引文献193

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部