利益相关者视角下的制度创业过程研究被引量：6

Research of Institutional Entrepreneurship:Based on the Stakeholder Perspectives

下载PDF

导出

摘要以往研究已经指出利益相关者会影响制度创业过程,但缺少对这一影响的理论基础及作用机制的深入阐述。通过对以往文献的归纳和分析,提出了将利益相关者纳入制度创业研究的3个理论基础要素——场域、资源和合法性,并从这3个要素出发了阐释了利益相关者是如何影响制度创业过程的。研究结论对于从利益相关者视角分析制度创业者如何借助相关策略获取资源和合法性具有一定理论启示意义。 Previous studies have pointed out that stakeholders may affect the process of the institutional entrepreneurship , but there was a lack of analysis about the theoretical basis and the mechanism of this influence. Based on the summary and analysis of former reseaehes, this paper puts forward three basic elements-the field, resources and legitimacy, and ex plores how stakehol.ders influence the progress of institutional entrepreneurship. This study has some theoretical implica- tions for the follow-up scholars, if they attempt to study how institutional entrepreneurs use relevant strategies to obtain resources and legitimacy based on the stakeholder perspective.

作者项国鹏黄玮

机构地区浙江工商大学工商管理学院浙江省林业厅林业基金中心

出处《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期26-31,共6页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71372010) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(12YJCZH222) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20133326110004) 浙江省软科学重点计划项目(2015C25038)

关键词制度创业利益相关者场域资源合法性 Institutional Entrepreneurship Stakeholder Field Resource Legitimacy

分类号 F272.2 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献34

1周其仁.“控制权回报”和“企业家控制的企业”：公有制经济“中企业家人力资本产权的个案[J].经济研究,1997,32(5):31-42. 被引量：233
2DIMAGGIO P J. Interest and agency in institutional theory [C]//ZUCKER. Institutional patterns and organizations,culture and environment. Cambridge, MA : Ballinger, 1988 : 3 21.
3Seo M, Creed W E D. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change:a dialectical perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002,27 (2) : 222 247.
4BATTILANA J, LECA B, BOXENBAUM E. How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entre- preneurship [J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2009,3(1) :65-107.
5GREENWOOD R, SUDDABY R. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1) :27-48.
6DELBRIDGE R, EDWARDS T. Challenging conventions: roles and processes during non-isomorphic institutional change[J]. Human Relations, 2008,61 (3) : 299-325.
7FREEMAN RE. Strategic managment: a stakeholder ap- proach[M]. Boston: Pitman, 1984.
8JONES T M. Instrumental stakeholder theory:a synthesis of ethics and economies[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(2) :404-437.
9WALSH J P. Taking stock of stakeholder management[J]. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(2):426-438.
10OLIVER C. Strategic response to institutional processes [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991,16 : 145-179.

二级参考文献59

1彭泗清.信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段[J].社会学研究,1999(2):55-68. 被引量：381
2Aldrich, H. E., Fiol, C. M., 1994, "Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation", Academy of Management Review, 19(4), pp. 545-670.
3Berger, T., Luckmann, P., 1967, The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday Anchor.
4Child, J., Lu, Y., Tsai, T., 2007, "Institutional Entrepreneurship in Building an Environmental Protection System for the People's Republic of China", Organization Studies, 28 (07), pp.1013-1034.
5Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., Scott, W. R., 2002, "Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum", Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1), pp. 45-57.
6DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W., 1983, "The iron cage revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", Ameri:an Sociological Review, 48, pp. 147-160.
7DiMaggio, P., 1988, "Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory", In Zucker, L. (Eds.), Institutional Patterns and Culture, pp. 3-22, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
8Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989, "Building Theories from Case Study Research", Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), pp. 532-550.
9Fligstein, N., 1990, The Transformation of Corporate Control, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10Fukuyama, F., 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: The Free Press.