期刊文献+

PI、血清NSE和炎症介质对脑复苏患者预后的预测价值 被引量:3

Role of the combination of pulsatility index, serum NSE and inflammatory mediator in evaluating prognosis of the patients after cerebral resuscitation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨联合经颅彩色多普勒(TCD)的搏动指数(PI)、血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFˉα)、白介素6(ILˉ6)对脑复苏患者预后的预测价值。方法选取中山大学附属东华医院ICU/EICU科室2011年10月至2014年10月收治的60例心肺复苏成功的患者,根据患者意识转清或改善且生存时间>30 d者为生存组(n=26),生存时间<30 d为死亡组(n=34),评价PI、血清NSE、TNFˉα、ILˉ6含量与格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分相关性并绘制ROC曲线评价上述指标预测预后的效果,比较联合指标与单一指标的优势。结果两组患者一般资料除急性心理与慢性健康状态评分系统II(APACHE II)评分外其他资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。死亡组PI、血清NSE、ILˉ6显著高于生存组(P<0.05,P<0.01),GCS评分低于生存组,差异均有统计学意义。所有患者中PI、血清NSE、ILˉ6与GCS评分正相关(P<0.05,P<0.01)。四指标联合判定曲线下面积最大(0.817)。结论 PI、血清NSE和炎症介质与脑复苏患者的GCS评分有一定的相关性,联合指标评价患者预后具有较高的准确性,具有临床应用价值。 Objective To evaluate the prognostic role of pulsatility index(PI),serum neuron specific enolase(NSE),tumor necrosis factor α(TNFˉα)and interleukin 6(ILˉ6)in patients after cerebral resuscitation. Methods Utstein model was adopted to collect the clinical data of patients. The serum TNFˉα and ILˉ6 levels were measured at 4 hour after cerebral resuscitation;PI,serum NSE and Glasgowˉpittsburgh score(GCS)were measured at one day after cerebral resuscitation. Patients who were survived longer than 30 day after resuscitation were assigned as survival group and those who were survived shorter than 30 days as death group. The correlations of GCS with PI,serum NSE,TNFˉα and ILˉ6 were evaluated and ROC curve were used to study the efficiency of these indexes. Results There was no significant difference of general information between two groups besides acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system(APACHE II)score(P0.05). The PI,serum NSE and ILˉ6 in death group were significantly higher than those in survival group(P0.05,P0.01). The PI,serum NSE and ILˉ6 was positively correlated with GCS(P0.05,P0.01). The 4 indexes combination had a max area under the cure(0.817). Conclusion Pulsatility index,serum NSE and inflammatory mediator have correlation with GCS of the patients after cerebral resuscitation,and using all 4 indexes in series has a superior veracity on evaluating prognosis,which is worth for clinical application.
出处 《热带医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第12期1644-1647,共4页 Journal of Tropical Medicine
基金 东莞市医疗卫生科技计划项目(2014105101003)
关键词 脑复苏 搏动指数 血清NSE 肿瘤坏因子α 白介素ˉ6 Cerebral resuscitation Pulsatility index Serum NSE TNFˉα ILˉ6
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献47

  • 1张弋,陈晓辉,江慧琳,许松青,林佩仪,李燕屏.炎症因子和氧自由基与心肺复苏后再灌注损伤关系探讨[J].现代医院,2005,5(9):13-15. 被引量:4
  • 2中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组.新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病诊断标准[J].中华儿科杂志,2005,43(8):584-584. 被引量:1299
  • 3赵江佩,黄华品.诱发电位判断昏迷患者预后的评价[J].医学综述,2006,12(3):186-188. 被引量:6
  • 4邱全曜 缪明永.神经元特异性烯醇化酶.生命的化学,2008,28(4):439-442.
  • 5Barnes J,Hassan A,Cuerden R,at al.Comparison of injury severity between AIS 2005 and AIS 1990 in a large injury database. Ann Adv Automot Med, 2009, 53: 83-89.
  • 6Hudak AM,Caesar RR, Frol AB,et al.Functional outcome scales in traumatic brain injury: a comparison of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (Extended) and the Functional Status Examination.J Neurotrauma,2005,22(11): 1319-1326.
  • 7Foreman BP,Caesar RR,Parks J,et al.Usefulness of the abbreviated injury score and the injury severity score in comparison to the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury.J Trauma, 2007, 62(4): 946-950.
  • 8Watkins TR,Nathens AB,Cooke CR,et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome after trauma: Development and validation of a predictive model Crit Care Med,2012,40(8):2295-2303.
  • 9Tan NC,Ang A,Heng D,et al.Evaluation of playground injuries based on ICD, E codes, international classification of external cause of injury codes (ICECI), and abbreviated injury scale coding systems.Asia Pac J Public Health,2007, 19(1):18-27.
  • 10Watts HF, Kerem Y, Kulstad EB.Evaluation of the revised trauma and injury severity scores in elderly trauma patients. Emerg Trauma Shock,2012,5(2): 131-134.

共引文献53

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部