期刊文献+

论我国产品责任发展风险抗辩之排除

The Exclusion of Developing Risk Defense about Product Liability in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《侵权责任法》第46条确立了产品的后续观察义务。后续观察义务的确立,其目的在于督促生产者对已经出售的产品随着科学技术水平的发展尽到注意义务,防止将缺陷产品投入市场造成大规模的损害,这就从根本上限制了《产品质量法》第41条第2款关于产品责任发展风险抗辩的基础。因此,在产品责任诉讼中,以发展风险进行抗辩必须以产品的后续观察义务的严格履行为前提,对因发展风险所致的缺陷产品致人损害的,如果没有积极履行产品的后续观察义务,将丧失掉发展风险抗辩的基础。 Following-up observing obligation improved on sold products was released in the Art.46 th in the Tort Claims Act of The People's Republic of China. The purpose of the legislation is to ensure producer on the duty of their sold products with the development of science and technology level, and prevent the defective products on the market from making great impact. These limit developing risk defense of product liability in the second paragraph of article 41 of the Product Quality Law. Therefore, developing risk defense should be the basis of following-up observing obligation of the products in the product liability lawsuit. If the defective products, due to developing risk, make consumer injured and the producer didn't actively fulfill following-up observation obligation, the basis of risk defense will be lost.
作者 宋苗
机构地区 四川警察学院
出处 《四川警察学院学报》 2015年第5期85-91,共7页 Journal of Sichuan Police College
关键词 产品责任 发展风险 后续观察义务 Product Liability Developing Risk Following-up Observing Obligation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[日]川岛武宜 王志安译.现代化与法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.56.
  • 2[德]拉伦茨.法学方法[M]. 陈爱娥译,台湾:台湾五南图书出版公司,1996:390.
  • 3周汉民,程斌.近晚期产品责任立法趋势即可供我国的借鉴[J].民商法学,1998,(1):197.
  • 4[美]E窑博登海默.法理学要要法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:281-299.
  • 5张云.突破与超越:《侵权责任法》产品后续观察义务之解读[J].现代法学,2011,33(5):174-183. 被引量:13

二级参考文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部