期刊文献+

埃莉诺与玛丽安的“趣味之争” 被引量:1

Elinor and Marianne's Dispute over Taste
原文传递
导出
摘要 在《理智与情感》一书中,埃莉诺与玛丽安的"趣味之争"折射了18世纪英国情感主义思潮的复杂性,而这种复杂性与英国中产阶级的发展密切相关。一方面,情感与善感是中产阶级提升自身文化地位并使之合法化的重要途径之一;另一方面,情感主义的过度发展却会导致社会失序,不利于中产阶级的稳定发展。有鉴于此,奥斯丁把"心智培育"提到了一个较高的位置,希望以此形成正确的"趣味"判断,并有效调和激情与理性、利己与利他、个人与社会之间的对立。埃莉诺与玛丽安的"趣味"之争看似无足轻重,却折射了18世纪末到19世纪初英国中产阶级修正自身极端自由主义的倾向,以及着眼于整体发展的文化诉求。 In Sense and Sensibility, Elinor and Marianne's dispute over taste reflects the complexity of sentimentalism in eighteenth-century England, which was closely related to the rise of the British middle class. On one hand, the eighteenth-century middle class members regarded the quality of sensibility as a way to enhance and legitimize their cultural position. On the other, the excess of sensibility would inevitably result in social disruption and therefore undermine the stability of the middle class. Through the dispute over taste, Austen stresses the importance of "cultivation," which helps to cultivate proper taste and effectively reconcile the conflicts between "sense" and "sensibility," self and other, individual and society. Therefore, insignificant as might seem the dispute, it actually reveals the cultural inclination of the late eighteenth and early nine-teenth century British middle class members who sought for a holistic development through rectifying their extreme liberalism.
作者 何畅
出处 《外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期63-70,共8页 Foreign Literature
基金 教育部人文社科项目"19世纪英国文学中的趣味焦虑和文化认同研究"(13YJC752009) 国家社科基金重大招标课题"文化观念流变中的英国文学典籍研究"(12&ZD172)
关键词 奥斯丁《理智与情感》 趣味 情感主义 中产阶级 心智培育 Jane Austen, Sense and Sensibility, taste, Sentimentalism, middle class, cultivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Barney, Richard A. Plots of Enlightenment : Education and the Novel in Eighteenth-Century England.Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999.
  • 2Butler, Marliyn. Jane Austen and the War of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.
  • 3Cooper, Anthony Ashley. Characteristics of Men,Manners? Opinions, Times. Ed. Lawrence E. Klein.Cambridge: CUP, 1999.
  • 4Dadlez, E. M. Mirrors to One Another: Emotion and Value in Jane Austen and David Hume. WestSussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
  • 5Eliot, T. S. Notes towards the Definition of Culture. London: Faber, 1948.
  • 6Glare, P. G. W.,ed. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: OUP, 1983.
  • 7Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. L_ A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.
  • 8Stonecastle, Henry. Universal Spectator. Vol. 3. Michigan: Gale Ecco, 1747.
  • 9Williams, Raymond. Keywords : A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1983.
  • 10阿诺德.《文化与无政府状态》,韩敏中译,北京:三联书店2008年版.

二级参考文献42

  • 1R. W. Chapman ed. , Jane Austen's Letters, 2^nded. (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1952) 401, 469.
  • 2Raymond Williams, The Country and the City (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1973) 113.
  • 3Alistair Duckworth, The Improvement of the Estate (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1971).
  • 4Marilyn Butler, Jane Austen and the War of ldeas (Oxford: Clarendon P., 1975).
  • 5玛·巴特勒.《浪漫派、叛逆者及反动派》,沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998年,第157-171页.
  • 6Raymond Williams: Keywords: a Vocabulary of Culture and Society (London: Fontana P., 1976) 280-282.
  • 7Clare Tomalin, Jane Austen (New York: Vintage, 1999) 155.
  • 8Frank W. Bradbrook, Jane Austen and Her Predecessors (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1966) 28-50.
  • 9David Monaghan, "Introduction", in Monaghan, ed. , Jane Austen in a Social Context (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1981) 4-6.
  • 10Julia Prewit Brown, Jane Austen's Novels: Social Changes and Literary Form (Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1979) 24.

共引文献33

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部