期刊文献+

RT-3DE评价风湿性二尖瓣狭窄瓣口面积的初步探讨 被引量:2

Assessment of MVA in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨实时三维超声心动图评价风湿性二尖瓣狭窄面积的可行性。方法选取23例健康志愿者为对照组;根据临床诊断结果 21例风湿性二尖瓣狭窄患者为病例组。分别应用二维法和实时三维容积法测量病例组二尖瓣瓣口面积,并比较两者测量方法的差异。绘制ROC曲线,对实时三维容积法测量诊断效能进行评价。2名测量者测量结果进行一致性检验。结果比较病例组与对照组测量的二尖瓣口面积,差异有统计学意义。病例组中二维和三维测量值的ROC曲线下面积比较,二者的诊断效能比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2名测量者测量结果一致性良好(k=0.789,0.777,0.787,0.786)。结论实时三维超声心动图评价风湿性二尖瓣狭窄面积具有可行性和可重复性,为临床风湿性二尖瓣狭窄瓣口面积的评价提供了一种新的测量方法。 Objective To explore the feasibility of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in mitral stenosis. Methods Twenty-three healthy volunteers were included as control group. The mitral stenosis group consisted of 21 patients. They were divided into two groups: 2D group and RT-3DE group. Mitral valve orifice area (MVA) was calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) eourve was drawn to assess the diagnostic efficiency. Interobserver agreement for MVA was calculated using the Kappa statistic. Results There were significant differences of the MVA between patient group and volunteer group ( P 〈 0. 001 ). The area under the curve (AUC) of MVA indicated that 2D was higher than RT-3DE in diagnosis of mitral stenosis (AUC 〉 0. 8). No significant difference of diagnostic value was found between 2D and RT-3DE ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Interobserver agreement was good ( k = 0.789, 0.777, 0.787, 0. 786). Conclusion RT-3DE showed its feasibility in mitral stenosis evaluation. It could be used to assess the MVA and may be a supplement method for clinical diagnostics.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2016年第1期55-57,70,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 风湿性心脏病 二尖瓣狭窄 超声心动图 实时三维 Echocardiography Real-time three-dimensional Mitral stenosis Rheumatic
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献69

  • 1马松峰,乔峻,霍强,木拉提.升主动脉不接触技术在非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(7):493-494. 被引量:3
  • 2刘敏,张力,刘国民,何艳慧,王丽娟,朱艳,李玮,李幼琼.正常人体二尖瓣的形态学观测[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2005,31(5):735-737. 被引量:5
  • 3周伟,马松峰,乔峻,木拉提,霍强,艾斯卡尔,艾克拜尔.高龄患者体外与非体外循环冠脉搭桥术对呼吸功能的影响[J].心脏杂志,2006,18(1):87-88. 被引量:5
  • 4CHAUVAUD S, FUZELLIER J F, BERREBI A, et al. Long-term (29 years) results of reconstructive surgery in rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency [J]. Circulation, 2001,104:I12-- 15.
  • 5YANKAH C A, SINIAWSKI H, DETSCHADES C, et al. Rheumatic mitral valve repair: 22-year clinical results[J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 2011,20 : 257-- 264.
  • 6GOLDSMITH I R, LIP G Y, PATEL R L, et al. A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2001,20 : 949-- 955.
  • 7OLIVEIRA J M, ANTUNES M J. Mitral valve re- pair: better than replacement[J]. Heart, 2006,92 : 275 --281.
  • 8AGRICOLA E, OPPIZZI M, DE BONIS M, et al. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography per- formed according to the Guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography in patients with mitral valve prolapse, flail, and endocarditis., diagnostic ac- curacy in the identification of mitral regurgitant de- fects by correlation with surgicai findings[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2003,16 : 61 -- 66.
  • 9SHAH P M, RANEY A A, DURAN C M, et al. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: a road- map for mitral valve repair[J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 1999,8:625--629.
  • 10GUPTA A, GHARDE P, KUMAR A S. Anterior mitral leaflet length: predictor for mitral valve repair in a rheumatic population[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010,90:1930--1933.

共引文献50

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部