期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

新格赖斯语用学的成就与失误 被引量：3

The Successes and Failures in Neo-Gricean Pragmatics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新格赖斯语用学是一个重要的当代语用学派别,他们坚持Grice提出的合作原则及其准则,为推动语用学的发展做出了不可磨灭的贡献。但是,这种理论也存在一些不足,如,过分强调了他们的数量原则与信息量原则之间的对立,霍恩等级的覆盖面太窄等。本文探讨新格赖斯语用学的得失,希望有助于提出一种新的替代方案。 As an important school of contemporary pragmatics, neo-Gricean pragmatics has insisted on the cooperative principle and its attendant maxims proposed by Grice, and made everlasting contributions to the development of pragmatics. There are also some problems in this theory, however, e.g., they have overemphasized the contrasts between their principle of quantity and that of informativeness, and the scope of Horn scale is too limited. This paper examines the successes and failures in neo-Gricean pragmatics with a view to contributing to the advancement of new alternatives.
作者 姜望琪
机构地区 北京大学外国语学院
出处 《天津外国语大学学报》 2016年第1期13-18,80,共6页 Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"基于多学科视域的认知研究"(12&ZD119)
关键词 新格赖斯语用学 数量原则 信息量原则 霍恩等级 neo-Gricean pragmatics principle of quantity principle of informativeness Horn scale
分类号 H030 [语言文字—语言学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Atlas, J. & S. Levinson. 1981. It-clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form[A]. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics[C]. New York: Academic Press.
  • 2Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition andLogical Form[M]. London: Academic Press.
  • 3Grice, E 1961. The Causal Theory of Perception[A]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society[C], supp. Vol. 35, 121-52.
  • 4Reprinted in Davis, S. (ed.) 1983. Causal Theories of Mind." Action, Knowledge, Memory, Perception, and Reference[C]. Berlin: Walter de Grnyter.
  • 5Grice, E 1967/1989. Studies in the Way of Words[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Grice, E 1987/1989. Retrospective Epilogue. In Studies in the Way of Words[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Hirschberg, J. 1984. Toward a Redefinition of Yes/No Questions[A]. In Proceedings of COLING -84[C], COLING, Stanford, CA.
  • 8Hirschberg, J. 1985. A Theory of Scalar Implicature[D]. PhD Dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.
  • 9Horn, L. 1984. Towards a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature[A]. In D.Schiffrin(ed.) Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications[C]. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • 10Horn, L. 1988. Pragmatic Theory[A]. In F. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

二级参考文献22

  • 1徐盛桓.基于模型的语用推理[J].外国语,2007,30(3):2-9. 被引量：134
  • 2索绪尔 高名凯译.普通语言学教程[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.101-102.
  • 3Bonnefon, J. F. & G. Villejoubert. 2005. Communicating likelihood and managing face: Can we say it is probable when we know it to be certain'? [A] In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou & M. Buciarelli (eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society [C]. NJ: Erlbaum, 316-321,.
  • 4Bonnefon, J. F. & G. Villejoubert. 2006. Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases [J]. Psychological Science 17: 747-751.
  • 5Bonnefon, J. F., A. Feeney & G. Villejoubert. 2009. When some is actually all: Scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts [J]. Cognition 112: 249-258.
  • 6Firth, J. R. 1950. Personality and language in society [J]. Sociological Review 42: 37-52.
  • 7Reprinted in J. R. Firth. 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951 [C]. London: Oxford University Press, 177-189.
  • 8Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics: lmplicature, Presupposition and Logical Form [M]. New York: Academic Press.
  • 9Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words [M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • 10Hirschberg, J. 1991. A Theory of Scalar lmplicature IM]. New York: Garland.

共引文献349

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

天津外国语大学学报
2016年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部