期刊文献+

不同产品类别在线评论对异质性消费者购买意愿影响 被引量:19

Online Review Impact on Heterogeneous Consumer Purchase Intention Based on Product Category
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于B2C平台搜索品和体验品分类视角,文章引入调节定向理论探究在线评论正负性对异质性消费者购买意愿的影响。研究表明:在线评论正负性对不同调节定向消费者的购买意愿存在差异性影响效果,相比于在线评论负面性的无差异影响效果,在线评论正面性对促进定向消费者购买意愿的影响效果总是高于预防定向消费者;消费者购买意愿的差异性源于搜索品与体验品的在线评论正负性敏感度不同;搜索品与体验品相比,在线评论正面性影响下,促进定向和预防定向消费者购买意愿差异程度都处于同一差异水平,在线评论负面性影响下,购买意愿均处于无差异低水平。 Based on the product category perspective of search and experience product in B2C platform,this paper introduces regulatory focus theory to explore the effects of online review on heterogeneous consumer purchase intention.The study has shown that online review differently influences customers' purchase intention of different regulatory focus;compared to no difference effect of the negative online review,positive online review effect on the purchase intention of promotion-focused consumers is always higher than the prevention-focused consumers.And difference of purchase intention is the result of different sensitivity of online review to search and experience product;comparing search and experience product,the degree differences of customers' purchase intention of different regulatory focus are at the same level under the online review positive effect,while the purchase intention is in a low level under the online review negative influence.
机构地区 四川大学商学院
出处 《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第1期1-5,共5页 Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目:"企业社会责任行为对丑闻品牌形象的修复机理及策略体系研究"(71372189)
关键词 产品类别 在线评论 调节定向 购买意愿 product category online review regulatory focus purchase intention
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献124

  • 1宋晓兵,董大海,于丹,刘瑞明.基于TRA理论的品牌购买行为倾向前因研究[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,28(4):12-18. 被引量:16
  • 2吴闻莺.微博网舆论聚合效应研究——微博围观、微博极化与微博动员[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2013,34(1):133-136. 被引量:36
  • 3温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰.有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):448-452. 被引量:722
  • 4Sengupta, J., & Zhou, R. (2007). Understanding impulsive eaters' choice behaviors: the motivational influences of regulatory focus. Journal of Marketing Research,44,297-308.
  • 5Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 433-446.
  • 6Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy X value effects: Regulatory focus as a determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458.
  • 7Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693-705.
  • 8Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A., Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.
  • 9Amodio, D. M., Shah, J. Y., Sigelman, J., Brazy, P. C., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 225-232.
  • 10Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: the role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 435-448.

共引文献167

同被引文献196

引证文献19

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部