期刊文献+

“任凭句”句式探析

The Analysis of “Renping”Sentence Patterns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 任凭句是一种极端情况下的让步句。根据前分句的形式特征,任凭句可分为单项任凭句、多项任凭句和总让任凭句。这三种类型的任凭句在认知层面具有明显的区别:单项任凭句的主观推测层面:0<P{B/A}<0.5,客观反映层面:P{B/A}=1;多项任凭句的主观推测层面:0<P{B/a1}<0.5,0.5<P{B/a2}<1或者0<P{B/a1va2}<0.5,客观反映层面:P{B/a1}=P{B/a2}=1;总括任凭句的主观推测层面:0<P{B/Amin(B)}<0.5,客观反映层面:P{B/Amin(B)}=1。最后讨论说话人在使用任凭句时所表达的无奈和坚定的不同心态。 "Renping"sentence is a kind of extreme conditions of concessions. According to the form characteristics of antecedent phrase, "Renping"sentence can be divided into monomial Renping sentence,multi-term Renping sentence and unconditional-concession Renping sentence. They have visible differences in the aspect of cognition: the subjective conjecture aspect of monomial Renping sentence is 0P {B/A}〈0.5,the objective reflection aspect is P{B/A}=1; the subjective conjecture aspect of multi-term Renping sentence is0P{B/a1}〈0.5,0.5〈P{B/a2}〈1 or 0P{B/a1va2}〈0.5,the objective reflection aspect is P{B/A}=1; the subjective conjecture aspect of unconditional-concession "Renping"sentence is 0P {B/A min(B)}〈0.5, the objective reflection aspect is P {B/A min(B)}=1.Finally,talking about two different thinking of helpless and determined when the speaker use Renping sentence.
作者 郭梦婷
出处 《绥化学院学报》 2016年第2期74-77,共4页 Journal of Suihua University
基金 陕西省社会科学基金项目"现代汉语复句格式与认知层面关系研究"(2015K026)
关键词 形式特征 认知层面 语用价值 语义项 form characteristics the aspect of cognitive pragmatic value semantic items
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:177
  • 3Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics [M]. Trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gablres, FL: University of Miami Press.
  • 4Bright, W. 1992. Internatioanl Encyclopedia of Linguistics [M]. 4 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Carey, K. 1995. Subjectification and the development ofthe English perfect [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995.83-102.
  • 6Finegsn, E. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation:an introduction [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 1-15.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 8Keller, R. 1995.The epistemic weil [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 16-30.
  • 9Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. 1987/1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Vols. Ⅰ & Ⅱ.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

共引文献2302

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部