期刊文献+

统一框架的混合依存句法分析 被引量:2

Unified Framework for Hybrid Dependency Parsin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 监督统计句法分析器的性能很大程度依赖于昂贵而有限的人工标注数据。为充分利用现有标注树库而不需额外设计句法分析器,该文提出了一种混合句法处理管线。该管线以基于最大生成树算法和线性链式条件随机场的句法分析器为基本框架,融合使用不同树库进行混合训练,综合利用不同树库对应的基线分析器解析的依存骨架,提取交叉信息,并在基本框架上构建了综合句法分析器。实验结果表明,该方法可以有效地提升单一树库的句法分析器的分析精度。 The mainstream dependency parser is a supervised statistical parser whose performance greatly relies on manually annotated dataset in recently. In order to use multi-treebank without building a new parser, a hybrid dependency processing pipeline is proposed. The pipeline is implemented through maximum spanning tree (MST) algorithm and linear chain conditional random fields (CRF) as base framework, and a hybrid dependency processing pipeline for training the parser by using multi-treebank is constructed, then a composite dependency parser is built from base framework to utilizes cross information of the multi-treebank with a set of hybrid feature templates. The result shows that the pipeline can improve the parsing precision of single-treebank parser without designing a new parser.
出处 《电子科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期102-106,150,共6页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
关键词 条件随机场 依存句法 混合句法分析 最大生成树 CRF dependency grammar hybrid dependency parsing MST
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1ZHOU Guang-you, CAI Li, ZHAO Jun, et al. Phrase-based translation model for question retrieval in community question answer archives[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011: 653-662.
  • 2NIVRE J, HALL J, NILSSON J. Memory-based dependency parsing[C]//Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL). Boston, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004: 49-56.
  • 3NIVRE J, HALL J, NILSSON J. MaltParser: a data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing[C]//Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2006). Genoa, Italy: European Language Resources Association, 2006: 2216-2219.
  • 4CHE Wan-xiang, SPITKOVSKY V L, LIU Ting. A comparison of Chinese parsers for stanford dependencies[C]//Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2012). Jeju Island, Korea: Association for Computational linguistics, 2012: 11-16.
  • 5LIU Ting, MA Jin-shan, LI Sheng. Building a dependency treebank for improving Chinese parser[J]. Journal of Chinese Languages and Computing, 2006, 16(4): 207-224.
  • 6XUE Nai-wen, XIA Fei, CHIOU Fu-dong, et al. The penn Chinese treebank: Phrase structure annotation of a large corpus[J]. Natural Language Engineering, 2005, 10(4): 1-30.
  • 7MCDONALD R, CRAMMER K, PEREIRA F. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers[C]//Proceeding of the 43th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Ann Arbor, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005: 91-98.
  • 8SHA F, PEREIRA F. Shallow parsing with conditional random fields[C]//Proceedings of the 2003 Human Language Technology Conference and North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT/NAACL-03). Edmonton, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003: 134-141.
  • 9NIVRE J, MCDONALD R. Integrating graph-based and transition-based dependency parsers[C]//Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Columbus, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008: 950-958.
  • 10ZHANG Yue, CLARK S. A tale of two parsers: Investigating and combining graph-based and transitionbased dependency parsing using beam-search[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP '08). Stroudsburg, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008: 562-571.

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部