期刊文献+

种植体支抗前牵上颌体的三维有限元分析 被引量:7

3-D finite element study on maxillary body protraction using implant anchorage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨对上颌种植体支抗施加不同大小和方向的前牵引力时颅面复合体骨缝处的应力变化。方法:用螺旋cT扫描安氏Ⅲ类患者颅面部以获取原始二维图像DICOM数据,建立颅面复合体的三维有限元模型,种植支抗设计在32J23间。模拟前牵引力值1~10N,1N递增,方向平行于眶耳平面向前下呈0°~60°,10°递增,两两组合共70种工况。分析各工况下颅面复合体各骨缝处第一主应力及Von Miese等效应力分布情况。结果:牵引角度相同力值不同时,各骨缝应力变化规律相同;牵引力值相同角度不同时,不同区间各骨缝应力变化不同。当牵引角度小于30°时,应力变化分析提示上颌体向前生长并向上旋转;等于30°时上颌体出现向前生长;在40°~50°时,上颌体向前生长方向与牵引方向大致相同;大于50°时,上颌体出现向前生长并向下旋转。结论:种植体支抗眶耳平面向前下30°~50°牵引加载力1~10N利于上颌体向前生长。 Objective: To explore the stress change rule of craniofacial bone suture and the interface of bone-implant against differ- ent strength and direction of protraction on the implant anchorage in alveolar bone. Methods:The original DICOM data of 2-D image of craniofacial complex were obtained by high resolution CT scanning. 3-D finite element models of craniofacial complex were devel- oped according to the DICOM data. Forces of 1 - 10 N inclined at 0 -60° to Frankfort horizontal plane in the anterior and inferior di- rections were respectively applied on the implant anchorage in the alveolar bone at 32123 . Data of principle stress and Von Mises Stress of each mode of each simulaton was caculated. Results : The change rule of the effectiveness of different force value of protrac- tion in the same direction was the same in different stress zone; that of the same force value of the protraction in differente direction differed in different stress zone. When the protraction angle was less than 30°, the maxillary complex will spin up. In the 30°, the maxillary complex showed the forward growth. Between 40°-50°, the growth direction was the same with the protraction direction. When the protraction angle was more than 50°, the maxillary complex showed down spin. Conclusion: Protraction force of 1 - 10 N at 30° -50°to Frankfort horizontal plane on implant anchorage in the alveolar bone at 32 丨23 can induce maxillary complex grow for-ward.
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期58-62,共5页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
基金 自然科学基金青年科学项目(编号:81300903) 四川省教育厅科研项目(编号:川教函[2009]749号09ZA047) 泸州市财企科研基金项目(编号:泸市财企[2010]41号2010-S-17(3/3))
关键词 颅面复合体 上颌体 前牵引 种植体支抗 Craniofacial complex Maxillary body Protraction Implant anchorage
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Ghiz MA, Ngan P, Gunel E. Cephalometric variables to pre- dict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005, 127 (3) :301 - 306.
  • 2Smaltey WM, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1988, 94(4) :285 - 295.
  • 3Singer SL, Henry PJ, Rosenberg I. Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: A case report[ J]. Angle Orthod, 2000, 70 (3) :253 - 262.
  • 4Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, et al. Faocmask thera- py with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia: A case report [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 123 (5) :571 - 577.
  • 5Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Kircetli C. Maxillary molar distal- ization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance[ J]. Angle Orthod, 2006, 76(4) :650 -659.
  • 6王洁丽,潘虹海,刘健,黄跃,杨四维.不同部位种植体支抗前牵引上颌的三维有限元分析[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2012,26(6):361-365. 被引量:6
  • 7罗晨,冯雪,汪金龙,曾照斌.应用种植体支抗辅助上颌前方牵引颅颌面骨缝应力特征的三维有限元分析[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2013,23(4):252-255. 被引量:6
  • 8Olmez S, Dogan S, Pekedis M, et al. Yildiz biomechanical evaluation of sagittal maxillary internal distraction osteogene- sis in unilateral cleft lip and palate patient and noncleft pa- tients : A three-dimensional finite element analysis [ J ]. An- gle Orthod, 2014, 84(5):815-824.
  • 9Tominaga JY, Tanaka M, Koga Y, et al. Optimal loading conditions for controlled movement of anterior teeth in sliding mechanics[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(6) :1102 - 1107.
  • 10Hickham JH. Maxillary protraction therapy: Diagnosis and treatment[J]. J Clin Orthod, 1991, 25(2):102- 113.

二级参考文献34

  • 1谷岩,A.Bakr M.Rabie,Urban Hgg.前方牵引器治疗安氏Ⅲ类错畸形—20例病例临床分析[J].口腔正畸学,2000,7(3):118-122. 被引量:59
  • 2郭涛,丁寅.不同垂直骨面型成年患者上气道形态和舌骨位置差异的研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(1):25-29. 被引量:25
  • 3Kilinc AS, Arslan SG, Kama JD, et al. Effects on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions of protraction and rapid palatal expansion in Class III malocclusion subjects[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2008, 30(9):61 -66.
  • 4Altug Z, Arslan AD. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance[J]. Angle Orthod, 2008,72 (3) :355 -361.
  • 5Halazonetis DJ, Katsavrias E, Spyropoulos MN. Changes in cheek pressure following rapid maxillary expansion [ J ]. Eur J Orthod, 1994, 16(8) :295 -300.
  • 6Hiyama S. Effects of maxillary protraction on craniofacial structures and upper-airway dimension [ J]. Angle Orthod, 2002,72(1) :43 -47.
  • 7Ozbek MM, Memikoglu UT, Altug-Atac AT, et al. Stability of maxillary expansion and tongue posture [ J ]. Angle Orthod, 2006, 79(2) :21d -220.
  • 8Baccetti T, McGill J S, Franchi L, et al. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion with maxillary ex- pansion and face-mask therapy[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003,113(3) :333-343.
  • 9Yoshida I, Shoji T, Mizoguchi I. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies[ J]. Eur J Orthod, 2007,29 ( 1 ) :26 - 133.
  • 10Takada K, Petdachai S, Sakuda M. Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modifi ed maxillary protraction headgear and chin cup: A longitudinal cephalometric appraisal [J]. Eur J Orthod, 1993, 15 (2) :211 -221.

共引文献28

同被引文献70

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部