摘要
随着民间建筑专业论坛兴起,原来在机构化环境中工作的实践者与学者被置入一个公共对话平台中。如是则身份与立场被弱化,论理与其识被倚重。当代建筑学已经不是一个自主自足的体系,它的学科内核并没有强大到可以独立生产知识。虽然机构像然会是培养基本学科技能与职业精神的主要平台,但是在前沿知识与话语层面上,民间平台会是不可或缺的补充。
With the rise of the "non-institutionalized" architectural forums, the practitioners and scholars who used to work in an institutionalized environment have been relocated to a public discursive platform. Their standpoints and identities are concealed; consensus and polemics are highlighted. Contemporary architecture is hardly considered to be an autonomous discipline which is able to produce its own knowledge. Although institutions are overwhelmingly the supreme device to cultivate elementary skills and professionalism, the non-institutionalized platforms will keep performing as a supportive force in producing the new frontier of architectural knowledge and discourse.
出处
《世界建筑》
2015年第12期134-135,共2页
World Architecture
关键词
在野
公共空间
学科
第五代建筑师
non-institutionalized, public space, discipline, the 5th generation of architects