期刊文献+

在野的建筑学

Non-institutionalized Architecture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着民间建筑专业论坛兴起,原来在机构化环境中工作的实践者与学者被置入一个公共对话平台中。如是则身份与立场被弱化,论理与其识被倚重。当代建筑学已经不是一个自主自足的体系,它的学科内核并没有强大到可以独立生产知识。虽然机构像然会是培养基本学科技能与职业精神的主要平台,但是在前沿知识与话语层面上,民间平台会是不可或缺的补充。 With the rise of the "non-institutionalized" architectural forums, the practitioners and scholars who used to work in an institutionalized environment have been relocated to a public discursive platform. Their standpoints and identities are concealed; consensus and polemics are highlighted. Contemporary architecture is hardly considered to be an autonomous discipline which is able to produce its own knowledge. Although institutions are overwhelmingly the supreme device to cultivate elementary skills and professionalism, the non-institutionalized platforms will keep performing as a supportive force in producing the new frontier of architectural knowledge and discourse.
作者 谭峥
出处 《世界建筑》 2015年第12期134-135,共2页 World Architecture
关键词 在野 公共空间 学科 第五代建筑师 non-institutionalized, public space, discipline, the 5th generation of architects
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Kostof, Spiro, ed. The Architect: Chapters in the History of the Profession. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
  • 2李翔宁.权宦建筑:青年建筑师与中国策略//朱剑飞.中国建筑60年(1949—2009):历史理论研究[G].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009:285—295.
  • 3Sennett, Richard. The Fall of Public Man. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1977.
  • 4Melton, James Van Horn. The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe. New Approaches to European History. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部