期刊文献+

初始投标值数量和样本容量对双边界二分式CVM的影响 被引量:12

Influence of initial bid number and sample size on the double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 双边界二分式条件价值评估法是当前广泛应用于评估生态环境和自然资源价值的陈述偏好法。为了研究双边界二分式CVM中,不同分布中初始投标值数量及样本容量对WTP的影响,应用蒙特卡洛模拟和支付意愿函数模型相结合的方法,用概率分位数设计投标值,分别选择数据来源不同的Weibull分布和对数Logistic分布,动态模拟不同初始投标值数量和样本容量对WTP期望值产生的影响。模拟结果表明,对不同的WTP概率分布,初始投标值数量和样本容量对WTP的影响趋势是一致的,当初始投标值数量和样本容量分别大于5和500时,初始投标值数量和样本容量的增加,对WTP估计值的影响程度越来越小。研究结果表明,在二分式CVM研究中,当以WTP期望为代表值时,其初始投标值数量和样本容量至少为5和500。研究结论为二分式CVM问卷设计中投标值数量及样本容量的设定提供参考依据。 The contingent valuation method (CVM) is a survey-based method that uses random samples of families or individuals to reveal consumer preferences for goods or services, such as environmental resources, in a hypothetical market. Through questionnaires, CVM identifies people's preferences and expresses them in dollar terms as willingness to pay (WTP) or willingness to accept (WTA). WTP ( or WTA) can be used to gain insights into the potential economic benefits or losses brought about by a planned project. A great variety of questionnaire formats have been developed and applied, among which the dichotomous choice CVM is considered to be one of the most advanced methods. In recent years, the double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method (DBDC-CVM) has been widely used to value the ecological environment and natural resources. It can identify respondents' true WTP and reduce the deviation of assessment results, thereby making the results more accurate and reliable. The initial bid number and sample size are very important determinants of WTP in DBDC-CVM. Fewer initial bids and smaller sample sizes will reduce the validity and reliability of the resultant WTP. In contrast, more initial bids and larger sample sizes increases the difficulty and cost of the survey. The number of initial bids is always obtained using a pre-test, while the sample size is always determined by field research or online surveys. This study investigates the dynamic effects of initial bid number and sample size on mean WTP, using the willingness to pay (WTP) function model and a-posteriori Monte Carlo simulation. We use Weibull and log-logisticdistributions of WTP to simulate two different sources of data. In order to simplify the Monte Carlo simulation, we quantize the probability distribution and make a hypothesis to design bids. We produce four graphs to visualize the simulated results and use these to identify the optimum number of initial bids and sample size. Initial bid number and sample size had almost the same influence on mean WTP for both WTP distributions. When the initial bid number t and sample size exceed 5 and 500, respectively, the influence on mean WTP is almost the same. Based on this result we suggest that at least 5 initial bids and 500 samples are needed in order to ensure the validity and reliability of estimates of mean of WTP generated by Monte Carlo simulation. These results provide a quantitative basis for CVM questionnaire design and have the potential to improve the validity and reliability of WTP.
机构地区 东北农业大学
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期854-862,共9页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171044)
关键词 双边界二分式 支付意愿 蒙特卡洛模拟 初始投标值数量 样本容量 double bounded dichotomous choice willingness to pay Monte Carlo simulation initial bids content sample size
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1陈琳,欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿,段晓男.条件价值评估法在非市场价值评估中的应用[J].生态学报,2006,26(2):610-619. 被引量:107
  • 2张志强,徐中民,程国栋,苏志勇.黑河流域张掖地区生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):885-893. 被引量:192
  • 3Davis R K. Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal, 1963, 3(2):239-249.
  • 4Hanemann W M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984, 66(3):332-341.
  • 5Bishop R C, Thomas H A. Measuring values of extra-market goods:Are indirect measures of value biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979, 61(5):926-930.
  • 6Cameron T A. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data:maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1988, 15(3):355-379.
  • 7Díaz M A, Gómez M G, González á S, De U?a álvarez J. On dichotomous choice contingent valuation data analysis:Semiparametric methods and Genetic Programming. Journal of Forest Economics, 2010, 16(2):145-156.
  • 8Carson R T, Hanemann W M, Mitchell R C. Determining the Demand for Public Goods by Simulating Referendums at Different Tax Prices. San Diego:Manuscript, University of California, 1986.
  • 9Hanemann M, Loomis J, Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991, 73(4):1255-1263.
  • 10蔡春光,陈功,乔晓春,郑晓瑛.单边界、双边界二分式条件价值评估方法的比较——以北京市空气污染对健康危害问卷调查为例[J].中国环境科学,2007,27(1):39-43. 被引量:41

二级参考文献104

共引文献396

同被引文献165

引证文献12

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部