期刊文献+

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with different contact tonometers in young healthy persons 被引量:2

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with different contact tonometers in young healthy persons
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To analyze the correlation of Goldmann applanation tonometer(GAT),I-Care tonometer and Tono-Pen tonometer results in young healthy persons,and to investigate the influence of central corneal thickness(CCT)on intraocular pressure(IOP)measurements recorded with these tonometers.·M ETHODS:We conducted a pilot clinical study in 78eyes of 78 subjects aged 22-28 years old(44 women and34 men;mean age 23.8±1.19y).IOP was measured using GAT,I-Care and Tono-Pen tonometers,followed by measurements of CCT.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0.·RESULTS:The mean IOPs and standard deviation(±SD)for GAT,I-Care and Tono-Pen were 15.62±2.281 mm Hg,16.29±2.726 mm Hg and 16.32±2.393 mm Hg,respectively.The mean CCT was 555.15±29.648μm.Clear positive correlations between GAT and I-Care,GAT and TonoPen,and I-Care and Tono-Pen tonometers were found(=0.867,〈0.001;=0.861,〈0.001;=0.915,〈0.001,respectively).In comparison between devices,BlandAltman analysis showed a significant mean difference(MD)in the measurements by GAT and I-Care of-0.679 mm Hg and by GAT and Tono-Pen of-0.705 mm Hg(〈0.001),but there was no significant difference between I-Care and Tono-Pe(〉0.05).Both non-gold standard tonometers were affected by CCT;that is,both I-Care and Tono-Pen tonometer values were significantly higher with higher CCT means(〉555μm;MD=-1.282,〈0.001;MD=-0.949,〈0.001,respectively)compared with GAT.·CONCLUSION:Both I-Care and Tono-Pen tonometers overestimated IOP compared with the GAT values.Either the I-Care or Tono-Pen tonometer could be used instead of GAT because there was no significant difference between their results.Higher CCT values(〉555μm)were associated with overestimated IOP values. AIM:To analyze the correlation of Goldmann applanation tonometer(GAT),I-Care tonometer and Tono-Pen tonometer results in young healthy persons,and to investigate the influence of central corneal thickness(CCT)on intraocular pressure(IOP)measurements recorded with these tonometers.·M ETHODS:We conducted a pilot clinical study in 78eyes of 78 subjects aged 22-28 years old(44 women and34 men;mean age 23.8±1.19y).IOP was measured using GAT,I-Care and Tono-Pen tonometers,followed by measurements of CCT.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0.·RESULTS:The mean IOPs and standard deviation(±SD)for GAT,I-Care and Tono-Pen were 15.62±2.281 mm Hg,16.29±2.726 mm Hg and 16.32±2.393 mm Hg,respectively.The mean CCT was 555.15±29.648μm.Clear positive correlations between GAT and I-Care,GAT and TonoPen,and I-Care and Tono-Pen tonometers were found(=0.867,〈0.001;=0.861,〈0.001;=0.915,〈0.001,respectively).In comparison between devices,BlandAltman analysis showed a significant mean difference(MD)in the measurements by GAT and I-Care of-0.679 mm Hg and by GAT and Tono-Pen of-0.705 mm Hg(〈0.001),but there was no significant difference between I-Care and Tono-Pe(〉0.05).Both non-gold standard tonometers were affected by CCT;that is,both I-Care and Tono-Pen tonometer values were significantly higher with higher CCT means(〉555μm;MD=-1.282,〈0.001;MD=-0.949,〈0.001,respectively)compared with GAT.·CONCLUSION:Both I-Care and Tono-Pen tonometers overestimated IOP compared with the GAT values.Either the I-Care or Tono-Pen tonometer could be used instead of GAT because there was no significant difference between their results.Higher CCT values(〉555μm)were associated with overestimated IOP values.
机构地区 Center of Eye Diseases
出处 《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 SCIE CAS 2016年第1期76-80,共5页 国际眼科杂志(英文版)
关键词 Goldmann tonometer I-Care tonometer Tono-Pen tonometer comeal thickness intraocular pressure Goldmann tonometer I-Care tonometer Tono-Pen tonometer comeal thickness intraocular pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Kirstein EM, Elsheikh A, Gunvant P. Tonometry-past, present and future. In Gunvant P, ed. Collrnma-Ctlrreol Clioraj anti Researro APerL 2011:88-89.
  • 2Stamper RL. A history of intraocular pressure and its measurement. Optnm 11:;2011;88(1):EI6-28.
  • 3Kyoung NK, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. ArIa Opotbaoon2013:91(S):e392-e396.
  • 4Sakata R, Numaga J. The utility of rebound tonometer in late elderly subjects. CiillnJlerv Agillff 2014:9:227 -232.
  • 5Muttuvelu DV, Baggesen K, Ehlers N. Precision and accuracy of the I-Care tonometer-Peripheral and central lOP measurements by rebound tonometry. Ael<l 0100;1102012;90(4):322-326.
  • 6Handley N. From Blue to blink - a history of glaucoma diagnosis and testing. Glaucoma Forum, Autumn 2002.
  • 7Schreiber W, Vorwerk CK, Langenbucher A, Behrens-Baumann W, Vie stenz A. A comparison of rebound tonometry (I Care) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophlhal71nngc 2007;104(4):299-304.
  • 8Schweier C, Hanson IV, Funk J, TOteberg-Harms M. Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with I-Care PRO rebound, Tono-Pen A VIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions. llHC Ophlhal71nI2013;13:44.
  • 9Yilmaz I, Altan C, Aygit ED, Alagoz C, Baz 0, Ahmet S, Urvasizoglu S, Yasa D, Demirok A. Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL. Con Opotbalom2014;8:1069-1074.
  • 10Dahlmann-Noor AH, Puertas R, Tabasa-Lim S, El-Karmouty A, Kadhim M, Wride NK, Lewis A, Grosvenor D, Rai P, Papadopoulos M, Brookes J, Bunce C, Khaw PT. Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study. llHJ OpF11 2013;3(4).pii: e001788.

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部