期刊文献+

论心理学历史的编纂与解读——基于解释学的立场

Compilation and Interpretation on the Psychological History——Based on the Standpoint of Hermeneutics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方心理学史能否客观解读,成为制约心理学史研究和编纂的关键问题,这既是影响学者学术思想能否被客观评价的问题,也是关乎学科发展的重大理论问题。有学者认为心理学史应遵照客观历史原封不动地进行客观性解读,有学者则认为心理学史应根据现代人的立场,寻求两种视域的融合。因此,也就有了心理学史研究客观性的问题,以及心理学史研究厚古说与厚今说的问题。本文认为应该在尊重客观心理学历史的前提下,立足于现代人的立场,用现代的眼光审视并解读心理学历史,做到寻求差异、积极比较、整合观点三方面。 Objective interpretation on the history of western psychology has become a key issue in the research and compilation on the psychological history, which is not only an issue of the objective evaluation of academic ideas, but also a major theoretical issue of the development of disciplines. Some scholars believe that psychological history should be in accordance with the objective historical, some scholars argue that psychological history should be according to the position of modern psychology; Some scholars think that psychological history should be according to the position of the modern people for the fusion of the two horizons. As a result, there will be a question of objectivity research for psychological history, and Historicism or Presentism. The article thinks that we should be based on the premise of respecting the objective psychological history and based on the position of the modern people, with a modern perspective to examine and interpret the history of psychology, so as to seek differences, positive comparison, integration of views in three aspects.
出处 《心理研究》 2016年第1期22-26,共5页 Psychological Research
关键词 西方心理学史 客观解读 主观性 客观性 psychological history objective interpretation subjectivity objectivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1张海钟,姜永志.当代理论心理学概论.北京:线装书局,2011,20-26.
  • 2Staats A W. Behaviorand personality: Psychological behaviorism. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc. 1996: 18-20.
  • 3[美]史密斯.当代心理学体系——历史、理论、研究和应用.郭本禹译.西安:陕西师范大学出版社,2005,248—254.
  • 4[美]韦恩·瓦伊尼,布雷特·金.心理学史一观念与背景.郭本禹译.北京:世界图书出版社,2008:46-79.
  • 5Helson H. what can we learn from the history of psy- chology? Journal of the History of the Behavioral Science, 1972, 8: 115-119.
  • 6Washburn M F. The Mackey-Skinner debate: a case for nothing buttery. Philosophical Psychology, 1997, 10. 473-479.
  • 7[美]墨菲,科瓦奇著.林方,王景和译.近代心理学历史导引.北京:商务印书馆,2010:695-698.
  • 8Stocking G W. On the limits of "presentism" and "historicism" in the historiography of the behavioral sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sci- ence, 1957, 1: 211-218.
  • 9Buss A R. In defense of a critical-presentist historiog- raphy. The fact-theory relationship and Marx's episte- mology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sci- ence, 1977, 13: 252-260.
  • 10Dewsbury D A. Comparative cognition in the 1930s. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2000, 7: 267-283.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部