摘要
西方心理学史能否客观解读,成为制约心理学史研究和编纂的关键问题,这既是影响学者学术思想能否被客观评价的问题,也是关乎学科发展的重大理论问题。有学者认为心理学史应遵照客观历史原封不动地进行客观性解读,有学者则认为心理学史应根据现代人的立场,寻求两种视域的融合。因此,也就有了心理学史研究客观性的问题,以及心理学史研究厚古说与厚今说的问题。本文认为应该在尊重客观心理学历史的前提下,立足于现代人的立场,用现代的眼光审视并解读心理学历史,做到寻求差异、积极比较、整合观点三方面。
Objective interpretation on the history of western psychology has become a key issue in the research and compilation on the psychological history, which is not only an issue of the objective evaluation of academic ideas, but also a major theoretical issue of the development of disciplines. Some scholars believe that psychological history should be in accordance with the objective historical, some scholars argue that psychological history should be according to the position of modern psychology; Some scholars think that psychological history should be according to the position of the modern people for the fusion of the two horizons. As a result, there will be a question of objectivity research for psychological history, and Historicism or Presentism. The article thinks that we should be based on the premise of respecting the objective psychological history and based on the position of the modern people, with a modern perspective to examine and interpret the history of psychology, so as to seek differences, positive comparison, integration of views in three aspects.
出处
《心理研究》
2016年第1期22-26,共5页
Psychological Research
关键词
西方心理学史
客观解读
主观性
客观性
psychological history
objective interpretation
subjectivity
objectivity