期刊文献+

概率组合与警告类型对合取谬误的影响 被引量:1

The Effect of Probability Combination and Warning Type on Conjunction Fallacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概率判断中的合取谬误是指违反事件发生概率的合取规则,而认为包含多个独立事件的复合事件的发生可能性大于其中某些事件的发生可能性的一种概率判断偏差现象。本研究探讨了概率组合类型与警告类型及其交互作用对合取谬误的影响,结果表明概率组合类型、警告类型的主效应均显著,但并未发现二者对合取谬误的影响存在交互作用。 The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment refers to a phenomenon of probability judgment bias, which results from violating the conjunction rules of event occurrence probability and regarding that the occurrence probability of conjunction event that contains multiple independent events is greater than that of conjunct events in it. This study examined the effect of probability combination, warning type and the interaction between them on the conjunction fallacy. The results suggested that the main effects of the two variables both reached the significant level. However, there was no interaction.
出处 《心理研究》 2016年第1期60-65,共6页 Psychological Research
关键词 合取谬误 合取事件概率组合类型 警告类型 conjunction fallacy probability combination type of the conjunctive event warning type
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Tversky A, Kahneman D. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judg- ment. Psychological Review, 1983, 90(4): 293-315.
  • 2Yates J F, Carlson B W. Conjunction errors: Evi- dence for multiple judgment procedures including "signed summation". Organizational Behavior and Hu- man Decision Processes, 1986, 37(2): 230-253.
  • 3Fisk J E, Pidgeon N. Conditional probabilities, poten- tial surprise, and the conjunction fallacy. The Quarter- ly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 1998, 51(3): 655-681.
  • 4Crupi V, Fitelson B, Tentori K. Probability, confirma- tion, and the conjunction fallacy. Thinking & Reason- ing, 2008, 14(2): 182-199.
  • 5Li S. Equate-to-differentiate approach: An application in binary choice under uncertainty. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2004, 12 (3): 269- 294.
  • 6Hertwig R, Benz B, Krauss S. The conjunction fallacy and the many meanings of "and". Cognition, 2008, 108(3) : 740-753.
  • 7Costello F J. How probability theory explains the con- junction fallacy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Mak- ing, 2009, 22(3): 213-234.
  • 8Nilsson H, Andersson P. Making the seemingly impos- sible appear possible: Effects of conjunction fallacies in evaluations of bets on football games. Journal of E- conomic Psychology, 2010, 31(2): 172-180.
  • 9Fisk J E, Pidgeon N. Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low component model in a contingent approach. Acta Psychologica, 1996, 94(1): 1-20.
  • 10Fantino E, Kulik J, Stolarz-Fantino S, et al. The conjunction fallacy: A test of averaging hypotheses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1997, 4 (1): 96- 101.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部