摘要
目的:探究不同拒绝敏感性大学生对社交情境中情绪性词语的记忆偏好。方法:本实验采用2(拒绝敏感性:高分组,低分组)×2(情绪词效价:积极,消极)×2(回忆倾向:自我,他人)混合实验设计。结果:1与低拒绝敏感性大学生相比,高拒绝敏感性大学生更倾向于记忆描述不同情绪效价的句子[F(1,52)=9.59,P<0.01];2所有大学生在记忆描述自我情绪的句子时比记忆描述他人情绪的句子时的成绩更好[F(1,52)=4.45,P<0.05];3与拒绝敏感性低分组大学生相比,拒绝敏感性高分组大学生在记忆描述他人消极情绪的句子时的成绩更好[F(1,52)=4.21,P<0.05],而且也更倾向于记忆描述自我的积极情绪的句子[F(1,52)=12.65,P<0.001]。结论:高拒绝敏感性大学生更倾向于记忆他人的消极情绪,并且会过度的关注此社交情境中自我产生的积极情绪。
Objective:To explore the memory bias for emotion words in social contact for different level ofrejection sensitivity in college students.Methods:2(Levelsof Rejection Sensitivity)×2(valence of words)×2(memory tends)mixed design was mainly adopted in this study to explore different memory bias ofsocial emotion words.Results:The results were as follows:①Participants with high rejection sensitivity had more memory bias than those with low rejection sensitivity;While those with low rejection sensitivity had less emotional memory bias[F(1,52)=9.59,P〈0.05];②For the memory bias as a kind ofdifference in groups,all groups had self-reference memory bias[F(1,52)=4.45,P〈0.05];③For the bias as a kind of difference among groups,participants with fragile high rejection sensitivity had more negative other-reference memory bias[F(1,52)=4.21,P〈0.05)]and more positive self-reference memory bias[F(1,52)=12.65,P〈0.001],but those with low self-esteem had no significantly negative or positive self or other-reference bias either.Conclusion:These results indicate that people with different rejection sensitivity,in different levels or different types,have different memory bias ofsocial emtion.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2016年第1期137-141,共5页
China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词
拒绝敏感性
社交
积极情绪词
消极情绪词
记忆
Levels of rejection sensitivity
Social contact
Positive emotional words
Negative emotional words
Memory