期刊文献+

Comparison of Wind Sat and buoy-measured ocean products from 2004 to 2013 被引量:1

Comparison of Wind Sat and buoy-measured ocean products from 2004 to 2013
下载PDF
导出
摘要 To evaluate the ocean surface wind vector and the sea surface temperature obtained from WindSat, we compare these quantities over the time period from January 2004 to December 2013 with moored buoy measurements. The mean bias between the WindSat wind speed and the buoy wind speed is low for the low frequency wind speed product (WSPD_LF), ranging from -0.07 to 0.08 m/s in different selected areas. The overall RMS error is 0.98 m/s for WSPD_LF, ranging from 0.82 to 1.16 m/s in different selected regions. The wind speed retrieval result in the tropical Ocean is better than that of the coastal and offshore waters of the United States. In addition, the wind speed retrieval accuracy ofWSPD LF is better than that of the medium frequency wind speed product. The crosstalk analysis indicates that the WindSat wind speed retrieval contains some cross influences from the other geophysical parameters, such as sea surface temperature, water vapor and cloud liquid water. The mean bias between the WindSat wind direction and the buoy wind direction ranges from -0.46° to 1.19° in different selected regions. The overall RMS error is 19.59° when the wind speed is greater than 6 m/s. Measurements of the tropical ocean region have a better accuracy than those of the US west and east coasts. Very good agreement is obtained between sea surface temperatures of WindSat and buoy measurements in the tropical Pacific Ocean; the overall RMS error is only 0.36℃, and the retrieval accuracy of the low latitudes is better than that of the middle and high latitudes. To evaluate the ocean surface wind vector and the sea surface temperature obtained from WindSat, we compare these quantities over the time period from January 2004 to December 2013 with moored buoy measurements. The mean bias between the WindSat wind speed and the buoy wind speed is low for the low frequency wind speed product (WSPD_LF), ranging from -0.07 to 0.08 m/s in different selected areas. The overall RMS error is 0.98 m/s for WSPD_LF, ranging from 0.82 to 1.16 m/s in different selected regions. The wind speed retrieval result in the tropical Ocean is better than that of the coastal and offshore waters of the United States. In addition, the wind speed retrieval accuracy ofWSPD LF is better than that of the medium frequency wind speed product. The crosstalk analysis indicates that the WindSat wind speed retrieval contains some cross influences from the other geophysical parameters, such as sea surface temperature, water vapor and cloud liquid water. The mean bias between the WindSat wind direction and the buoy wind direction ranges from -0.46° to 1.19° in different selected regions. The overall RMS error is 19.59° when the wind speed is greater than 6 m/s. Measurements of the tropical ocean region have a better accuracy than those of the US west and east coasts. Very good agreement is obtained between sea surface temperatures of WindSat and buoy measurements in the tropical Pacific Ocean; the overall RMS error is only 0.36℃, and the retrieval accuracy of the low latitudes is better than that of the middle and high latitudes.
出处 《Acta Oceanologica Sinica》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第1期67-78,共12页 海洋学报(英文版)
基金 The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No.41105012
关键词 WindSat polarimetric microwave radiometer wind vector sea surface temperature validation WindSat, polarimetric microwave radiometer, wind vector, sea surface temperature, validation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献47

  • 1Atlas R, Coauthom. The effects of marine winds from scatterometer data on weather analysis and forecasting. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2001, 82:1965-1990.
  • 2Ahn J U V, Coauthors. Hurricane force extratropical cyclones as observed by the QuikSCAT scatterometer, paper presented at 8th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface. Am. Meteoml. Soc., Seattle, WA, 2003.
  • 3Chen S C, Coauthors. Application of SSM/I satellite data to a hurricane simulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 2003, 132: 749 -763.
  • 4Park K, Zou X. Assimilation of QuikSCAT surface winds observations for hurricane initialization and prediction, paper presented at 8th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere. Oceans, and Land Surface. Am. Meteorol. Soe. , Seattle, WA, 2003.
  • 5Leidner S M, lsaksen L. Hoffman R N. Impact of NSCAT winds on tropical cyclones in the ECMWRF 4DVAR assimilation system. Mon. Wea. Rev. , 131:3-26, 2003.
  • 6Liu Q, Weng F. Retrieval of sea surface wind vectors from simulated satellite mircowave polarimetric measurements. Radio Sci., 2003, 38(4) :8078, doi:10. 1029/2002RS002729.
  • 7Grell G A, Dudhia J, Stauffer D R. A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398 + STR, Natl. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo., 1995 : 122.
  • 8Barker D M, Coauthors. A three-dimensional variational data assimilation system for MMS: Implementation and initial results. Mon. Wea. Rev. , 2004, 132:897-914.
  • 9Monaldo F M. Evaluation of WindSat wind vector performance with respect to QuikSCAT estimates. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 2006, 44:638-644.
  • 10Freilich M H, Vanhoff B A. The accuracy of preliminary WindSat vector wind measurements: comparisons with NDBC buoys and QuikSCAT. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , 2006, 44:622- 637.

共引文献14

同被引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部