期刊文献+

聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子预防化疗后中性粒细胞减少的多中心随机对照Ⅱ期临床研究 被引量:18

A multicenter,randomized,controlled,phase Ⅱ clinical study of PEG-rhG-CSF for preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价单次给予不同剂量聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子(PEG-rh G-CSF)预防乳腺癌患者化疗后引起的中性粒细胞减少的安全性与疗效。方法按随机、平行分组、开放性、阳性对照原则,将受试者按1∶1∶1∶1比例随机分为PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg/kg组、PEG-rh G-CSF100μg/kg组、PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg/kg组和rh G-CSF 5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组,所有患者采用TAC化疗方案。化疗21d为1个周期。结果 4度中性粒细胞减少的发生率比较显示,PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg/kg组高于rh G-CSF5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组,PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg组和PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg/kg组与rh G-CSF 5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组相当。4度中性粒细胞减少的持续时间比较显示,PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg/kg组长于rh G-CSF5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组,PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg组和PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg/kg组与rh G-CSF 5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组相当。PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg/kg组、PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg组和PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg/kg组中性粒细胞减少性发热的发生率分别为7.0%、4.7%和11.9%,rh G-CSF 5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组为11.6%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.5043)。PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg/kg组、PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg组和PEG-rh G-CSF120μg/kg组从化疗用药结束到中性粒细胞减少达到最低点的时间分别为(7.88±1.80)d、(7.88±2.12)d和(7.14±1.05)d,而rh G-CSF 5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组为(8.93±3.39)d,差异有统计学意义(P=0.0008)。PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg/kg组、PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg组和PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg/kg组中性粒细胞减少从最低值达2.0×109/L以上所需要的时间分别为(3.44±3.08)d、(2.47±1.79)d和(2.90±2.54)d,rh G-CSF 5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组为(4.02±4.04)d,差异无统计学意义(P=0.0982)。PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg/kg组、PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg组和PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg/kg组和rh G-CSF5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)组不良事件的发生率分别为95.4%(41/43)、93.0%(40/43)、92.9%(39/42)和90.7%(39/43),差异无统计学意义(P=0.9202)。结论接受TAC化疗方案的乳腺癌患者于化疗后48 h单次注射PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg,不良反应程度轻。单次注射PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg与连续注射rh G-CSF 5μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)比较,预防化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少的安全性和疗效相当,推荐以PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg进行Ⅲ期临床试验。 Objective The study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single administration of different doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor( PEGrh G-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients,in order to provide the basis for the development of phase III clinical trial program. Methods According to the randomized,parallel-group,open,and positive control principle,all patients,who were undergoing TAC chemotherapy with 21 days / cycle,were randomized by1∶ 1∶ 1∶ 1 to receive PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg / kg,or PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg / kg,or PEG- rh G-CSF 120μg / kg,or rh G-CSF 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1). Results In the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia,the value for the PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg / kg group was higher than that of the 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)group,and the values for the PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg / kg group and the PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg / kg group were similar with that of the rh G-CSF 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)group. Compared with 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)group,the duration of grade 4 neutropenia of the PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg / kg group were longer,and that of the groups of PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg / kg and PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg / kg were similar with that in the rh G-CSF 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)group. The incidence of febrile neutropenia in the PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg / kg group,PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg / kg group and PEG-rh GCSF 120μg / kg group were respectively 7. 0%, 4. 7% and 11. 9%, and 11. 6% in the rh G-CSF5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)group,the differences were not statistically significant( P = 0. 5043). The mean interval between the end of chemotherapy and the neutrophil nadir in the PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg / kg group,PEG-rh GCSF 100μg / kg group and PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg / kg group were respectively( 7. 88 ± 1. 80) days,( 7. 88 ±2. 12) days and( 7. 14 ± 1. 05) days,and( 8. 93 ± 3. 39) days in the rh G-CSF 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)group,the differences were statistically significant( P = 0. 0008). And the mean interval from the neutrophil nadir to neutrophil count ≥2. 0 × 109/ L of the groups of PEG-rh G-CSF 60μg / kg,PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg / kg and PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg / kg were respectively( 3. 44 ± 3. 08) days,( 2. 47 ± 1. 79) days and( 2. 90 ± 2. 54)days,compared with( 4. 02 ± 4. 04) days in the rh G-CSF 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1)group,the differences were not statistically significant( P = 0. 0982). The incidence of adverse events in the test groups of PEG-rh G-CSF60μg / kg,PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg / kg and PEG-rh G-CSF 120μg / kg were 95. 4 %( 41 /43),93. 02%( 40 /43) and 92. 86%( 39 /42),and 90. 7%( 39 /43) in the control group of rh G-CSF 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1),respectively,the differences were not statistically significant( P = 0. 9202). Conclusions In the breast cancer patients undergoing TAC chemotherapy,a single injection of PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg / kg from the 48 hours post-chemotherapy had mild adverse reactions. The safety and efficacy of a single injection of PEGrh G-CSF 100μg / kg in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia were similar with that of daily injection of rh G-CSF 5 μg·kg^(-1)·d^(-1),thus a single injection of PEG-rh G-CSF 100μg/kg can be recommended for the phase III clinical trial.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2016年第1期3-7,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 肿瘤 聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子 中性粒细胞减少 Neoplasms Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF) Neutropenia
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Molineux G. Pegylation: engineering improved pharmaceuticalsfor enhanced therapy [ J ]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2002, 28 : 13-16.
  • 2Klastersky J, Awada A. Pmventien Of febrile neutropenia in chemotherapy- treated cancer patients:pegylated versus standard myeloid colony stimulating factors. Do we have a choice [ J 1. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2011, 78:17-23.
  • 3杨晟,石远凯,刘鹏,韩晓红,何小慧,蔡永明,陈拯民.注射用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子Ⅰ期临床药效学[J].中国医学科学院学报,2006,28(3):339-344. 被引量:13

二级参考文献11

  • 1石远凯,孙燕.造血生长因子在肿瘤化疗中应用的研究进展[J].癌症进展,2003,1(2):91-96. 被引量:22
  • 2石远凯,周际昌,冯奉仪,曾万勇,李青,何小慧,张弘刚,张湘茹,周立强.基因重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子对肿瘤化疗所致白细胞减少的临床疗效观察[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1994,16(3):207-210. 被引量:35
  • 3杨晟,何小慧,石远凯.聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子研究与应用概况[J].中国药学杂志,2005,40(17):1281-1285. 被引量:14
  • 4石远凯,刘鹏,杨晟,韩晓红,何小慧,艾斌,秦燕,李博,黄鼎智,张长弓,孙燕.注射用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子I期临床耐受性试验[J].癌症,2006,25(4):495-500. 被引量:31
  • 5Johnston E,Crawford J,Blackwell S,et al.Randomized,dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy.J Clin Oncol,2000,18(13):2522-2528.
  • 6Nicola NA,Peterson L,Hilton DJ,et al.Cellular processing of murine colony-stimulating factor (Multi-CSF,GM-CSF,GCSF) receptors by normal hemopoietic cells and cell lines.Growth Factors,1988,1(1):41-49.
  • 7Larsen A,Davis T,Curtis BM,et al.Expression cloning of a human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor:a structural mosaic of hematopoietin receptor,immunoglobulin,and fibronectin domains.J Exp Med,1990,172(6):1559-1570.
  • 8Fukunaga R,Seto Y,Mizushima S,et al.Three different mRNAs encoding human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1990,87(22):8702-8706.
  • 9Roskos LK,Yank B,Schwab G,et al.A cytokinetic model of r-metHUG-CSF-SD/01 mediated granulopoiesis and "self-regulation" of SD-01,elimination in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Blood,1998,92(Supvl 1):507a.
  • 10Layton JE,Hockman H,Sheridan WP,et al.Evidence for a novel in vivo control mechanism of granulopoiesis:mature cellrelated control of a regulatory growth factor.Blood,1989,74(4):1303-1307.

共引文献12

同被引文献129

引证文献18

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部