试论请求权竞合问题

The Discussion of the Question of Right of Claim

请求权竞合是民法理论和司法实务中长期争论的焦点之一。从《合同法》122条关于侵权责任与合同责任的竞合及《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第十二条中关于工伤责任与侵权责任的竞合等法律规范来看,我国目前在立法精神上是在有限的范围内采用请求权竞合的制度,司法实践中也允许请求权的有限竞合。这一制度在理论领域尚不成熟,司法实践中也常常出现截然不同的裁判结果。本文试从请求权竞合的实质出发,结合诉讼标的理论的发展规律,兼顾实体法和程序法规范,尝试阐述构建请求权竞合制度的基本思路。

The right of Claim is the focus of long-term controversy between civil law theory and judicial practice. On the 122 contract of Contract Law and Article 12 of People's Supreme Court on personal injury compensation cases,this system is not ripe in the field of judicial yet. Practice often results in different magistrate. This paper is trying to build the right to request the basic system of competing ideas from the right to request the substance of competing,the subject of litigation with the rules governing the development,take into account substantive and procedural law norms.