期刊文献+

从语义困境到理论潜力——中国本土宗教学理论建构的“术语”问题 被引量:3

From Semantic Dilemma to Theoretical Potential: Some Terminological Issues about the Construction of the Theory on China's Domestic Religious Studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着对中国本土信仰生活的田野观察,以及从文化和社会史角度出发的信仰传统研究日益深入,适应本土文化及信仰语境的宗教学理论建构,已经成为宗教研究的重要课题。中国宗教研究的术语概念多是以白话文的形式译自西方宗教学概念体系的,因此,术语概念在跨文化和跨时代的双重翻译中呈现出与理论来源及研究对象的语义交叉关系。通过对身体、宇宙及宗教等几个术语概念的语义结构分析,从梳理出术语概念的语义结构的几种形式中,分析在宗教研究中运用术语概念可能面临的理论挑战。以此为基础,在语义困境的分析中发现中国本土宗教学理论建构的资源和潜力。 Based on the fruitful research in the domestic religious life and practice in China, as well as the religious traditions that have been rooted in her cultural context, the academics of religious studies in China are gradually focusing their theoretical reflection on the methodological construction on the basis that the understanding of the nativeness of Chinese culture is considered as the contextual foundation of religious studies. Through figuring out three kinds of semantic frameworks, this essay is designed to analyze the semantic structure of the key terms for religious studies with a comparison between the theoretical framework imported from Western academics and the traditional Chinese cultural context. In this way, the essay attempts to demonstrate the difficulties of making religious studies in China' s cultural context, due to the vagueness of the key terms in meaningwithin the semantic overlapping caused by cross-cultural and diachronic vicissitudes. However, the author tries to clarify that the semantic dilemma in defining the meanings of the key terms could be the startingpoint of the theoretical reflection and reconstruction of the methodology of domestic religious studies in China.
作者 程乐松
机构地区 北京大学哲学系
出处 《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期47-56,共10页 Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 本土宗教学理论 语义结构 身体 宇宙 宗教 theory of domestic religious studies, semantic structure, body, cosmos, religion
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Ninian Smart, Religion and the Western Mind, State University of New York Press, 1987.
  • 2David Tracy,Dialogue with the other : the inter-religious dialogue, Peeters Press, 1991, pp. iv - vi.
  • 3Jonathan Z. Smith,Map is not territory: studies in the history of religions,University of Chicago Press, 1993.
  • 4MarianneBastid-Burguiere,著,张广达,译.《梁启超与宗教问题》,收入《东方学报》,第70册,第329-373页.
  • 5张志刚.“中国无宗教论”反思[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,50(3):5-14. 被引量:14
  • 6张志刚.“四种取代宗教说”反思[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,49(4):32-43. 被引量:17
  • 7张志刚.宗教是什么?——关于“宗教概念”的方法论反思[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,43(4):23-34. 被引量:37
  • 8Jonathan Z. Smith, "Religion, religions, religious", ed. by Mark C. Tylor, Critical Terms for Religious Studies, University of Chicago Press, 1998,pp. 269 - 271.
  • 9Melford E. Spiro, "Religion: Problems of definition and explanation", ed. by Michael Banton ,Anthropological Approaches to the study of Religion, Tavistock, 1986.
  • 10Hans H. Penner, Impasse and religion : A Critique of the Studies of religion, Peter Lang, 1972.

二级参考文献32

  • 1利玛窦,金尼阁.《利玛窦中国札记》,何高济等译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2001年,第229页.
  • 2斯马特.《世界宗教》(第二版),高师宁等译,北京:北京大学出版社2004年版,第3-13页.
  • 3陈独秀.《再论孔教问题》,载《新青年》,1917年第2卷第5号.
  • 4利玛窦 金尼阁著 何高济译.《利玛窦中国札记》[M].北京:中华书局,1985年.第123页.
  • 5蔡元培.《以美育代宗教说》[A]..《蔡元培全集》第三册[C].中华书局,1984年版.第211页.
  • 6WILLIAM P. ALSTON. "Religion". The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7 [M]. ed. Paul Edwards. NewYork: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. , 1967.
  • 7JOHN HICK. Philosophy of Religion ( Third Edition)[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, INC., 1973.
  • 8[英]约翰·希克.宗教之解释—人类对超越者的回应[M].王志诚译.成都:四川人民出版社.1998.
  • 9PAUL TILLICH. Theology of Culture [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1959.
  • 10DAVID M. WULFF. Psychology of Religion: Classic and Contemporary [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, INC., 1997.

共引文献121

同被引文献63

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部