期刊文献+

不道德行为产生后的道德自我评价 被引量:7

Disharmony of Mind and Tongue:The Moral Self-evaluation Made after People Were Engaged in the Unethical Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究人们在产生不道德行为后的道德自我评价特点。方法:通过操控想像启动范式,采用内隐联想测验和诚实-谦逊量表测量被试的道德自我评价。结果:两种实验条件中的相容任务反应时都要显著短于不相容任务反应时(实验组:t=-13.42,P<0.01;控制组:t=-12.85,P<0.01);相较于常规行为组被试,不道德行为组被试表现出更消极的内隐道德自我评价(t=-2.05,P<0.05,d=-0.55),而两组在外显测量上的道德自我评价不存在显著差异(t=-1.03,P=0.31,d=-0.28);两种实验条件中的内隐道德自我评价和外显道德自我评价都不存在显著相关(实验组:r=-0.308,P>0.05;控制组:r=-0.003,P>0.05)。结论:人们的道德自我评价存在积极倾向,即人们总是积极看待自我与道德相关的品质;不道德行为产生后的道德自我评价存在内隐倾向;人们的内隐道德自我评价和外显道德自我评价存在分离现象。 Objective:To explore the characteristics of the moral self-evaluation made after people was engaged in the unethical behavior.Methods:By manipulating the imagine priming paradigm,using the implicit association test and the Honesty-Humility scale to measure the moral self-evaluation.Results:Reaction time of compatible task was significantly shorter than the reaction time of incompatible task in both experimental conditions(experimental group:t=-13.42,P〈0.01;control group:t=-12.85,P〈0.01).In the transgression condition,negative self-evaluation was increased compared to the control condition(t=-2.05,P〈0.05,d=-0.55),and two groups of the moral self-evaluation showed that there was no significant difference on the explicit measure(t=-1.03,P=0.31,d=-0.28).The explicit moral self-evaluation and implicit moral self-evaluation had no significant correlation in both experimental conditions(experimental group:r=-0.308,P〉0.05;control group:r=-0.003,P〉0.05).Conclusion:People'moral self-evaluation has positive tendency,in other words,people tend to be generally positive about moral quality regarding the self;people have implicit tendency of moral self-evaluation after engaged in the unethical behavior;the explicit moral self-evaluation and the implicit moral self-evaluation separate from each other.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2016年第2期235-239,共5页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 广西研究生教育创新计划资助项目(编号:YCSW2014080)
关键词 道德自我评价 不道德行为 内隐联想测验 双重加工模型 Moral self-evaluation Unethical behavior Implicit association test Dual-process model
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Newman G E, Bloom P, Knobe J. Value judgments and the true self[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2014,40 (2) : 203-216.
  • 2Epley N,Dunning D.Feeling " holier than thou ":Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction. [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000:79-79.
  • 3Greene J D.Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains[J].Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007,11 (8) : 322-323.
  • 4Gawronski B, Bodenhausen G V. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation : An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2006,132 (5) : 692-731.
  • 5Deutsch R, Strack F. Duality models in social psychology: From dual processes to interacting systems[J].Psychological Inquiry, 2006,17:166-172.
  • 6Perugini M,Leone L.Implicit self-concept and moral aetion[J]. Journal of Research in Personality,2009,43(5):747-754.
  • 7Johnston M E, Sherman A, Grusec J E.Predicting moral outrage and religiosity with an implicit measure of moral identity[J]. Journal of Research in Personality,2013,47(3) :209-217.
  • 8Tangney J P, Stuewig J, Mashek D J.Moral emotions and moral behavior[J].Annual Review of Psychology, 2007,58 : 345-345.
  • 9Bandura A.Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective[J].Asi- an Journal of Social Psychology, 2001,2 (1) : 21-41.
  • 10Rothmund T, Baumert A. Shame on me implicit assessment of negative moral self-evaluation in shame-proneness[J]. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2014,5 (2) : 195-202.

二级参考文献50

  • 1张镇,李幼穗.内隐自尊的研究趋势及测量方法[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):961-963. 被引量:18
  • 2金耀基.“面”、“耻”与中国人行为之分析[M]//杨国枢.中国人的心理.台北:桂冠图书公司,1988.
  • 3Heine S J,Lehman D R,Markus H R,et at. In there a universal need for positive self -- regard [J ]. Psychological Review, 1999,106 (4) 766-794.
  • 4Greenwald A G,Farham S D. Using the implicit association test to measure self--esteem and self--concept[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000,79 (6): 1022-1038.
  • 5Monin B, Jordan A H. Dynamic Moral Identity.. A social psychologieal perspective[M]//D. Narvaez, D Lapsley (Eds). Personality, Identity, and Character: Explorations in Moral Psychology Cambridge. England : Cambridge University Press, 2008 : 341-354.
  • 6Allport G W. Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality[M]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1955.
  • 7Shalvi S, Dana J, Handgraaf M J J, De'Dreu C K W. Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011,115:181-190.
  • 8Gino F, Ayal S, & Ariely D. Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior : The effect of one bad apple on the barrel[J]. Psychological Science, 2009,20: 393-398.
  • 9Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2008,45 : 633-644.
  • 10Tenbrunsel A E, Diekmann K A, Wade-Benzoni K A, Bazerman M H. The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2010,30: 153-173.

共引文献14

同被引文献65

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部