期刊文献+

三阴性乳腺癌HER2(0/1+)和HER2(2+)的相关基因表达差异

Gene expression difference between HER2(0/1+) and HER2(2+) in the triple-negative breast cancers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)HER2(0/1+)和HER2(2+)两组中CK5/6、EGFR、VEGF、COX-2和TOPⅡα的表达差异及其临床意义。方法:收集2010年1月~2014年12月TNBC患者HER2(0/1+)组30例,HER2(2+)组15例,采用免疫组织化学方法检测CK5/6、EGFR、VEGF、COX-2和TOPⅡα的表达。结果:与HER2(2+)组比较,HER2(0/1+)组中CK5/6、EGFR、VEGF、COX-2和TOPⅡα的表达均偏高,但不具有统计学差异(P〉0.05);且与患者年龄、肿瘤大小、病理学类型及分级、淋巴结转移、脉管侵犯均无相关性(P〉0.05)。结论:TNBC HER2(0/1+)和HER2(2+)两者存在一些基因表达差异,可能为临床靶向治疗药物的选择提供理论依据。 Objective: To investigate the expression difference of CK5 /6,EGFR,VEGF,COX-2,TOPⅡα genes and their clinical significance between HER2( 0 /1 +) and HER2( 2 +) in the triple-negative breast cancers( TNBC). Methods: Thirty cases of TNBC with HER2( 0 /1 +) and 15 with HER2( 2 +) were included. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect the expression of CK5 /6,EGFR,VEGF,COX-2 and TOPⅡα in the tissue specimens obtained from the TNBC cases. Results: Up-regulated expression of CK5 /6,EGFR,VEGF,COX-2 and TOPⅡα was observed in cases of HER2( 0 /1 +),yet the difference was not statistically significant,and expression of these genes was not correlated with the patient's ages,tumor size,type of pathology,histology grade,lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion( P〈0. 05). Conclusion: Expression of HER2( 0 /1 +) appears somewhat different from that of in TNBC,and this biological marker may be an important theoretical support to molecular target therapy for TNBC.
出处 《皖南医学院学报》 CAS 2016年第1期22-25,共4页 Journal of Wannan Medical College
基金 皖南医学院中青年科研基金项目(WK201513)
关键词 三阴性乳腺癌 HER2 表达 差异 triple-negative breast cancer HER2 expression differences
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献42

  • 1张瑰红,施达仁,梁晓曼,侯景辉,康苏娅,朱卫东,李晓兵,邵云,陈丽荣,周燕.显色原位杂交和免疫组织化学检测乳腺癌HER2/neu基因状况和蛋白表达的对照性研究[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(10):580-583. 被引量:29
  • 2<乳腺癌HER2检测指南>编写组,霍临明.乳腺癌HER2检测指南[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(10):631-633. 被引量:164
  • 3杨光之,皋岚湘,丁华野.乳腺基底细胞样癌[J].诊断病理学杂志,2007,14(4):241-244. 被引量:24
  • 4Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 (33) :5287-5312.
  • 5Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, et al. American Society of Chnical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer[ Jl. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 ( 1 ) : 118- 145.
  • 6Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth faetor reeeptor 2 testing in breast eaneer: American Society of Clinical Oneology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update[J]. J Clin Oneol, 2013, 31 (31) :3997-4013.
  • 7Hanna WM, Kwok K. Chromogenic in-situ hybridization:a viable ahernative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the HER2 testing algorithm[J]. Mod Pathol, 2006, 19(4) :481-487.
  • 8Park K, Han S, Kim JY, et al. Silver-enhanced in situ hybridization as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for assaying HER2 amplification in clinical breast cancer [ J ]. J Breast Cancer, 2011, 14(4) :276-282.
  • 9Haines GK 3rd, Wiley E, Susnik B, et al. HER2 in well differentiated breast cancer: is testing necessary? [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008, 112(3) :551-556.
  • 10Zhu X, Lu Y, Lu H, et al. Genetic alterations and protein expression of HER2 and chromosome 17 polysomy in breast cancer [J]. Hum Pathol, 2011,42(10) : 1499-1504.

共引文献342

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部