期刊文献+

A refined risk explicit interval linear programming approach for optimal watershed load reduction with objective-constraint uncertainty tradeoff analysis

A refined risk explicit interval linear programming approach for optimal watershed load reduction with objective-constraint uncertainty tradeoff analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 To enhance the effectiveness of watershed load reduction decision making, the Risk Explicit Interval Linear Programming (REILP) approach was developed in previous studies to address decision risks and system returns. However, REILP lacks the capability to analyze the tradeoff between risks in the objective function and constraints. Therefore, a refined REILP model is proposed in this study to further enhance the decision support capability of the REILP approach for optimal watershed load reduction. By introducing a tradeofffactor (α) into the total risk function, the refined REILP can lead to different compromises between risks associated with the objective functions and the constraints. The proposed model was illustrated using a case study that deals with uncertainty- based optimal load reduction decision making for Lake Qionghai Watershed, China. A risk tradeoff curve with different values of a was presented to decision makers as a more flexible platform to support decision formulation. The results of the standard and refined REILP model were compared under 11 aspiration levels. The results demon- strate that, by applying the refined REILP, it is possible to obtain solutions that preserve the same constraint risk as that in the standard REILP but with lower objective risk, which can provide more effective guidance for decision makers. To enhance the effectiveness of watershed load reduction decision making, the Risk Explicit Interval Linear Programming (REILP) approach was developed in previous studies to address decision risks and system returns. However, REILP lacks the capability to analyze the tradeoff between risks in the objective function and constraints. Therefore, a refined REILP model is proposed in this study to further enhance the decision support capability of the REILP approach for optimal watershed load reduction. By introducing a tradeofffactor (α) into the total risk function, the refined REILP can lead to different compromises between risks associated with the objective functions and the constraints. The proposed model was illustrated using a case study that deals with uncertainty- based optimal load reduction decision making for Lake Qionghai Watershed, China. A risk tradeoff curve with different values of a was presented to decision makers as a more flexible platform to support decision formulation. The results of the standard and refined REILP model were compared under 11 aspiration levels. The results demon- strate that, by applying the refined REILP, it is possible to obtain solutions that preserve the same constraint risk as that in the standard REILP but with lower objective risk, which can provide more effective guidance for decision makers.
出处 《Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第1期129-140,共12页 环境科学与工程前沿(英文)
基金 This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41222002), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20100001120020) and "China National Water Pollution Control Program" (2013ZX07102-006). Special thanks to Dr. Daniel Obenour in University of Michigan.
关键词 refined risk explicit interval linear program-ming decision making objective-constraint uncertaintytradeoff aspiration level Lake Qionghai Watershed refined risk explicit interval linear program-ming, decision making, objective-constraint uncertaintytradeoff, aspiration level, Lake Qionghai Watershed
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Conley D J. Biogeochemical nutrient cycles and nutrient management strategies. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 410: 87-96.
  • 2National Research Counci1. Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
  • 3Diaz R J, Rosenberg R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science, 2008, 321(5891): 926-929.
  • 4Liu Y, Guo H C, Yu Y J, Dai Y L, Zhou F. Ecological-economic modeling as a tool for lake-watershed management: a case study of Lake Qionghai Watershed, China. Limnologica-Ecology and Management oflnland Waters, 2008,38(2): 89-104.
  • 5Conley D J, Paerl H W, Howarth R W, Boesch D F, Seitzinger S P, Havens K E, Lancelot C, Likens G E. Ecology. Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science, 2009, 323(5917): 1014-1015.
  • 6Voinov A, Gaddis E B. Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: a perspective from modeling practitioners. Ecological Modelling, 2008, 216(2): 197-207.
  • 7Liu Y, Zou R, Riverson J, Yang P J, Guo H C. Guided adaptive optimal decision making approach for uncertainty based watershed scale load reduction. Water Research, 2011, 45(16): 4885-4895.
  • 8Ayyub B M Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis in Civil Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1998.
  • 9OberkampfW L, DeLand S M, Rutherford B M, Diegert K V, Alvin K F. Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2002, 75(3): 333-357.
  • 10Baresel C, Destouni G. Uncertainty-accounting environmental policy and management of water systems. Environmental science & technology, 2007, 41(10): 3653-3659.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部