期刊文献+

特质焦虑个体在高难度Stroop任务下的情绪启动效应 被引量:19

Emotional Priming Effects on Difficult Stroop Task for Trait Anxiety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过问卷法,选取高特质焦虑和低特质焦虑个体作为本实验的研究对象,考察了正性、负性和中性三种情绪启动条件下,不同特质焦虑个体在完成高难度的Stroop任务时的差异。结果发现,相比低特质焦虑被试,高特质焦虑被试的Stroop效应量更大;两组被试在正性和负性情绪启动条件下的Stroop效应量均更大。表明高特质焦虑被试的认知抑制功能不足,正性和负性情绪启动对高特质焦虑和低特质焦虑被试完成高难度的Stroop任务均产生了阻碍作用。 "Attentional control theory" assumes that anxiety impairs attention control, which is the core of executive function; this then canses anxious people to possibly have poor performance on executive functions. In contrast, others have found that anxiety does not have impacts on executive function. It is still an open question whether the cognition of anxious people is damaged. Anxious people are easily distracted by threat-related information and are impaired in their ability to regulate attention to the threatening stimuli. This attentional bias in favor of threat-related information is well established for both clinical anxiety and trait anxiety in the non-pathological range. Consequently, emotion stimulus may affect the cognition of anxious people more than normal participants. The present study investigates how different emotions affect the cognition inhibition for trait anxious participants. A 3 (emotion type: positive, negative, neutral) × 3 (task type: congruent, incongruent, irrelevant) × 2 (participant type: trait anxiety, normal) mixed experiment design was carried out. 144 pictures were selected from CAPS (48 positive, 48 negative, 48 neutral) to induce the participants' emotions; Stroop task was used to induce cognition inhibition. Fifty-seven participants selected from 1055 university students took part in the experiment; the students whose scores on the trait anxiety questionnaire exceed 57 for girls and 56 for boys were labeled as trait anxious participants, and the students whose scores on the trait anxiety questionnaire were below 30 were labeled as normal participants. We found that the Stroop effect of trait anxiety for anxious participants was larger than that of normal participants. The Stroop effect occurred after positive and negative emotions were larger than that after neutral emotions. The results illustrated that the cognition inhibition that was destroyed was impaired by positive and negative emotions for all the participants.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期8-12,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 天津市科技计划项目"天津市民心理健康素质监测系统开发"(12ZCZDSF07100) 天津市"心理健康与行为调控"创新团队(39) 潍坊医学院科技计划项目"奖惩对焦虑个体抑制控制的影响"(KB2014012) 山东自然科学基金联合专项情绪影响焦虑个体抑制控制的多模态成像研究(ZR2015CL027)的资助
关键词 情绪 特质焦虑 STROOP任务 emotion, trait anxiety, Stroop
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献168

  • 1黄宇霞,罗跃嘉.国际情绪图片系统在中国的试用研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(9):631-634. 被引量:100
  • 2姜春萍,周晓林.情绪的自动加工与控制加工[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):688-692. 被引量:20
  • 3沙丽曼,王纯,刘军,钟杰.宾州忧虑问卷在中国大学生人群中的初步修订[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(30):24-27. 被引量:13
  • 4郑晓华 舒良 等.状态-特质焦虑问卷在长春的测试报告[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(2):60-62.
  • 5Mansell W. Cognitive psychology and anxiety. Psychiatry, 2004, 2: 6-10
  • 6Mogg K, Bradley BP. Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2002, 40(12) : 1403 - 1414
  • 7Vuilleumier P. Facial expression and selective attention. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 2002, 15:291 -300
  • 8Williams J M G, Watts F, Macleod C, Mathews A. Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders, Second Edition. John Willey & Sons, 2001 : 106- 133
  • 9Fox E, Lester V, Russo R. Facial expressions of emotion: are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition and Emotion, 2002, 14:61-92
  • 10Amir, N, & Elias, J. Allocation of attention to threat in social phobia: difficulty in disengaging from task irrelevant cues. Personality and Individual Differences, 2003, 36: 1957 - 1967

共引文献427

同被引文献165

引证文献19

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部