摘要
Forward: The experience of land management in Shenzhen gives us the enlightenments: First, it is imperative toimplement commodification of land in China and full scale implementation. This trend will lead to the following 4benefits, namely: increase the effectiveness of land use dispositioning accelerate opening up to the outside world, allowfair competition among enterprises and enable the concentration of financial resources of the country and to bringabout a new source of financial income for the country. Secondly, there should be a clear model in thecommodification of land in China. It is appropriate for Shenzhen to choose the Commonwealth model i.e., the HongKong model, for reference for its commodification of land. However, we must abide by the principle that land re-sources are reasonably created under the condition that the relationship between ownership of land and rights to useremains unchanged. To implement commodification of land, it is necessary to establish perfect market for the tradingof parcels of land. This market has to be based on the prereguisite of public ownership of land, monopolized by thestate in accordance to the principle (of public ownership of land, monopolized by the state in accordance to the prin-ciple) of commodification. Thirdly, this management must be implemented by phases in different places instead ofmass action. The whole country can be roughly divided into four categories: the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) repre-sented by Shenzhen, the heavy industrial base along the southeast coastal region, some medium-sized open cities andthe northwest and southwest regions, where different practice should be adopted in different categories. Fourthly,commodification of land is closely linked with commodification of housing properties the whole situation of whichneeds to be taken into consideration in a comprehensive manner.
Forward: The experience of land management in Shenzhen gives us the enlightenments: First, it is imperative to implement commodification of land in China and full scale implementation. This trend will lead to the following 4 benefits, namely: increase the effectiveness of land use dispositioning accelerate opening up to the outside world, allow fair competition among enterprises and enable the concentration of financial resources of the country and to bring about a new source of financial income for the country. Secondly, there should be a clear model in the commodification of land in China. It is appropriate for Shenzhen to choose the Commonwealth model i.e., the Hong Kong model, for reference for its commodification of land. However, we must abide by the principle that land re- sources are reasonably created under the condition that the relationship between ownership of land and rights to use remains unchanged. To implement commodification of land, it is necessary to establish perfect market for the trading of parcels of land. This market has to be based on the prereguisite of public ownership of land, monopolized by the state in accordance to the principle (of public ownership of land, monopolized by the state in accordance to the prin- ciple) of commodification. Thirdly, this management must be implemented by phases in different places instead of mass action. The whole country can be roughly divided into four categories: the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) repre- sented by Shenzhen, the heavy industrial base along the southeast coastal region, some medium-sized open cities and the northwest and southwest regions, where different practice should be adopted in different categories. Fourthly, commodification of land is closely linked with commodification of housing properties the whole situation of which needs to be taken into consideration in a comprehensive manner.
