期刊文献+

轴流压气机带冠静叶和不带冠静叶的比较研究 被引量:3

Comparison investigation of axial flow compressors with and without shrouded stators
原文传递
导出
摘要 在设计清华大学1.5级轴流跨音压气机试验台过程中,将静叶形式由带冠改为不带冠。为考察不带冠静叶能否满足气动设计要求,该文采用计算流体力学方法,对上述2种静叶形式的压气机进行数值模拟和比较分析,并对不带冠静叶间隙大小对压气机性能的影响进行研究。结果表明:不带冠静叶在设计点效率提高1.8%,且数值失速裕度提高1.5%,能够满足气动设计指标。设计点效率提高的原因在于:泄漏流和端壁二次流起到相互抑制的作用,二次流引起的分离区尺度因而得以削减。分析同时表明:在较大间隙(0.8mm)时,泄漏流会起主导作用,影响静叶根部损失和落后角分布,因此试验台加工制造中需要对静叶间隙大小进行控制。 The stator design was changed from shrouded to unshrouded for the Tsinghua 1.5-stage transonic axial flow compressor test rig to study whether the unshrouded stator met the design requirements.Both shrouded and unshrouded configurations were simulated using CFD,with the influence of the stator gap size also investigated.The results show that the efficiency is 1.8%higher at the design point and the stall margin increases by 1.5%for the compressor with the unshrouded stator.The leakage flow and endwall secondary flow are balanced at a smaller gap,but the clearance flow tends to be dominant near the endwall at a larger gap,e.g.0.8mm.Therefore,the gap size should strictly be controlled in the manufacturing process.
作者 李想 顾春伟
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期1361-1366,共6页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家"九七三"重点基础研究资助项目(2007CB210105)
关键词 轴流跨音级压气机 带冠静叶 不带冠静叶 数值模拟 二次流 间隙泄漏流 transonic axial flow compressor shrouded stator unshrouded/cantilevered stator numerical simulation secondary flow leakage flow
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Cumpsty N A. Compressor Aerodynamics [M]. Harlow, UK.. Longman Scientific Technical, 1989.
  • 2Horlock J H. Axial Flow Compressors, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics [M]. London, UK: Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1958.
  • 3Adkins G G, Smith L H. Spanwise mixing in axial-flow turbomachines [J]. Journal of Engineering for Pozver-Transactions of the ASME, 1982, 104(1) : 97 - 110.
  • 4Lakshminarayana B, Horlock J. Leakage and Secondary Flows in Compressor Cascades [M]. Norwich, UK: HMSO, 1967.
  • 5Lei V M, Spakovszky Z S, Grdtzer E M. A criterion for axial compressor hub-corner stall [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery- Transactions of the ASME, 2008, 130(3) : 1 - 10.
  • 6McDougall N M, Cumpsty N A, Hynes T P. Stall inception in axial compressors [J], Journal of Turbomachinery, 1990, 112(1) : 116 - 123.
  • 7Freeman C. Effect of Tip Clearance Flow on Compressor Stability and Engine Performance, Lecture Series, 6 [R]. Brussels, Belgium: yon Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, 1985.
  • 8Swoboda M, Ivey P, Wenger U', et al. An experimental examination of cantilevered and shrouded stators in a multistage axial compressor [C]// Proceedings oI the International Gas Turbine Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition. New York, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1998.
  • 9Lange M, Mailach R, Vogeler K. An experimental investigation of shrouded and cantilevered compressor stators at varying clearance sizes [C]// Proceedings of the ASME Conference. New York, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010:75 - 85.
  • 10Koch C C. Stalling pressure rise capability of axial flow compressor stages [J]. Journal of Engineering for Power, 1981, 103(4): 645-656.

同被引文献8

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部