期刊文献+

胸腔镜肺叶切除术后两种单根胸腔闭式引流方法的效果比较 被引量:9

Comparison of the clinical effect of single thoracic closed drainage with two different methods after thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较胸腔镜肺叶切除术后两种不同单根胸腔闭式引流方法的引流效果。方法行胸腔镜肺叶切除的患者177例,根据其术后留置胸腔引流管方式的不同,将其分为两组,软管组(28F-蕈形引流管,前端置入胸膜腔顶,胸膜腔底部留置侧孔)和硬管组(普通硬质胸腔引流管,置入胸膜腔深度3~5cm,前端留置侧孔),比较两组患者术后胸腔引流量、胸腔引流管带管时间、住院时间、术后疼痛评分以及术后皮下气肿发生率。结果两组患者性别、年龄、手术部位及病理类型比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。软管组患者术后疼痛评分为(4.31±0.22)分,硬管组为(5.22±0.19),两组比较差异有统计学意义P〈0.05);上肺叶切除患者术后采用软管引流方法,其术后带管时间、住院时间及术后皮下气肿发生率分别为(3.92±1.85)天、(6.81±1.65)天和12.9%,硬管组分别为(4.61±2.36)天,(8.87±2.21)天和31.4%,两组比较差异有统计学意义P〈0.05或〈0.01)。对于下肺叶切除的患者,软管引流除了减少疼痛刺激以外,其他方面比较差异均无统计学意义。结论前端置入胸膜腔顶部、底部留置侧孔的单根软管胸腔闭式引流更适合于胸腔镜肺叶切除的患者,尤其是上肺叶切除的患者。 Objective To evaluate the the clinical effect of single thoracic closed drainage with two different methods after thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy. Methods 117 patients who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary lobeetomy between March 2014 and March 2015 in thoracic surgery department of Xiang-Ya Hospital,Centrol South University were included in this study. All the patients were divided into two groups, one group with soft tubes (28F-Mushroom drainage tube with side holes at the bottom and the front end was placed at the top of pleural cavity) , and the other group with hard tube ( ordinary hard tube with side hole at front end and inserted into pleural cavity with the depth of 3 -5cm ). The amount of drainage, the duration time with tube, hospitalization days, pain severity score and incidence of subcutane- ous emphysema after surgery were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no statistical significance in the gender,age, operation sites and pathological category between two groups (P 〉 0.05 ). The pain score in the group with soft tube is lower than the group with hard tube ( 4.31 ±0.22 vs 5.22 ± 0.19, P 〈 0.05 ). For the patients underwent upper pulmonary lobectomy, the group with soft tube showed shorter duration of drainage and hospitalization days and lower incidence of postoperative subcutaneous emphysema (3.92 ±1.85vs4.61±2.36,P〈0.05;6.81±1.65vs8.87±2.21,P〈0. 05;12.9% vs31.4%,P〈 0.01 ) , especially in subcutaneous emphysema (P 〈 0.01 ). But for lower pulmonary lobectomy, there were no significant difference except for the pain score. Conclusion The way of single thoracic drainage tube with side holes at the bottom and the front end into the top of pleural cavity is more suitable for the pa- tients with thoracoscopic lobectomy, especially for the patients received upper pulmonary lobectomy.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2015年第12期923-926,共4页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81401901、81372515)
关键词 胸腔镜肺叶切除 单根胸腔引流管 胸腔闭式引流 thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy single thoracic drainage tube shoracic closed drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Alex J, Ansari J, Bahalkar P, et al. Comparison of the immediate post-operative outcome of using the conventional two drains versus a single drain after lobectomy [ J ]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003,76 ( 4 ) : 1046- 1049.
  • 2Go'mez-Caro A, Roca MJ,Torres J, et al. Successful use of a single chest drain postlobectomy instead of two classical drains : a randomized study[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2006,29(4) :562-566.
  • 3Okur E, Baysungur V, Tezel C, et al. Comparison of the single or doub- le chest tube applications after pulmonary lobectomies [ J ]. Eur J Car- diothorac Surg,2009,35 ( 1 ) :32-36.
  • 4Pawelczyk K, Marciniak M, Kacprzak G, et al. One or two drains after lobectomy? A comparison of both methods in the immediate postopera- tive period [ J ]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2007,55 ( 5 ) : 313-316.
  • 5Zhang Y, Li H, Hu B, et al. A prospective randomized single-blind control study of volume threshold for chest tube removal following lo- bectomy[ J]. World J Surg,2014,38 ( 1 ) :60457.
  • 6肖威章,陈新明,曹翔,薛群,尤庆生.胸管拔除后两种置管口封闭的方法比较分析[J].临床外科杂志,2013,21(3):224-225. 被引量:4
  • 7时辉,梅龙勇,车国卫.肺癌术后胸腔闭式引流术应用的新观念[J].中国肺癌杂志,2010,13(11):999-1003. 被引量:65

二级参考文献24

  • 1吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1832-1835.
  • 2Christos Prokakis,Efstratios N. Koletsis,Efstratios Apostolakis,Nikolaos Panagopoulos,Hellen Stamou Kouki,George C. Sakellaropoulos,Kriton Filos,Dimitrios V. Dougenis.Routine Suction of Intercostal Drains Is Not Necessary After Lobectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial[J]. World Journal of Surgery . 2008 (11)
  • 3Pawelczyk K,Marciniak M,Kacprzak G,et al.One or two drains after lobectomy?A comparison of both methods in the immediate postoperative period. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery . 2007
  • 4Fukuia T,Sakakurab N,Kobayashia R,et al.Comparison of methods for placing and managing a silastic drain after pulmonary resection. Interact Cardiovasc orac Surg . 2009
  • 5Gomez-Caro A,Roca MJ,Torres J,et al.Successful use of a single chest drain postlobectomy instead of two classical drains:a randomized study. European Journal of Cardio Thoracic Surgery . 2006
  • 6Nakamura H,Taniguchi Y,Miwa K,et al.e use of Blake drains following general thoracic surgery:is it an acceptable option?. Interact Cardiovasc orac Surg . 2009
  • 7Alex J,Ansari J,Bahalkar Pet al.Comparison of the immediate postoperative outcome of using the conventional two drains versus a single drain after lobectomy. Ann orac Surg . 2003
  • 8Efstratios E Apostolakis,Nikolaos G.Single or double drain after lung resections?. European Journal of Cardio Thoracic Surgery . 2009
  • 9Saxena P,Kejriwal N,Newman MA.Use of Blake drains following lung resection. European Journal of Cardio Thoracic Surgery . 2006
  • 10Edward R.oracic drainage. Ann orac Surg . 1997

共引文献67

同被引文献93

引证文献9

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部