期刊文献+

环境正义视域中的邻避及其治理之道 被引量:2

On the NIMBY and Its Countermeasure from the Perspective of Environmental Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 邻避本身是一个环境行为学的概念,源自于生活环境的改变。因而,邻避可以界定为公民维护和争取自身环境权益的行动。邻避具有一定的正义性。首先,公民环境权决定了公民可以参与自身环境使用的选择与决策;其次,公民的环境保护义务决定了公民可以对破坏环境的设施建设加以抵制。然而,邻避也有一定的限度,极端个人主义与极端环境主义的邻避都是非正义的。邻避治理只有采取环境正义取向,才能消除邻避的动因,从根本上规避邻避的发生。首先,应明确环境权及其边界,实现承认的正义化;其次,应推进环境补偿的科学全面,实现分配的正义化;最后,要转变邻避设施建设模式,实现程序的正义化。 NIMBY(not in one's backyard) is a concept in the study of environment behavior,and originates from the change of living environment.NIMBY can be defined as such an activity that citizens maintain and fight for their environmental rights and interests.Therefore,NIMBY is of some justice.First,the environmental right of citizens determines their choices and decisions in their environmental participation;second,citizens' duty of environmental protection determines that they can resist the facilities construction against the environment.However,NIMBY has certain limitations.Both NIMBY of extreme individualism and of extreme environmentalism are unjust.Only by the orientation of environmental justice can NIMBY's motives be eliminated so as to fundamentally avoid NIMBY.It is,at first,to clear the environmental right and its boundary to justify the recognition;secondly,to improve the environmental compensation scientifically and comprehensively to justify the distribution;finally,to shift the mode of NIMBY's facilities construction to justify the procedure.
作者 刘海龙
出处 《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2015年第6期68-72,共5页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家林业局2015年重点课题"生态意识与林业发展的互动机制研究"(2015-2)
关键词 环境正义 邻避 环境权 属性 治理 environmental justice NIMBY environmental right property countermeasure
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Kraft E, Clary B. Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal[J]. The Western Political Quarterly, 1991 (2) : 299- 328.
  • 2Bruno S. Frey, Felix Oberhoizer-Gee, and Reiner Eichenherger. The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets[J].The Journal of Political Economy, 1996,104(6) : 1297- 1313.
  • 3Mcgurty M. From NIMBY to Civil Right: The Origins of the Environmental Justice Movement[J].Environmental History,1997,(3) : 301-323.
  • 4David N. Pellow. Environmental Inequality Formation: Toward a Theory of Environmental Injustice[J]. American Behavioral Scientist,2000 ,43(4) :581 -601.
  • 5Wolsink M. Invalid Theory Impedes Our Understanding: a Critique on the Persistence of the Language of NIMBY[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2006,31(1) :85-91.
  • 6朱谦.环境权问题:一种新的探讨路径[J].法律科学,2004,22(5):96-103. 被引量:62
  • 7[日]富井利安.环境法的新展开[M].东京:法律文化社,1995:57.

二级参考文献14

  • 1吕忠梅.超越与保守:可持续发展视野下的环境法创新[M].北京:法律出版社,2003..
  • 2李鸿禧.论环境权之宪法人权意义[A]..宪法与人权[C]:台大法学丛书[C].,..
  • 3.宪法位阶的环境权:从拥有环境到参与环境决策[A].叶俊荣.环境政策与法律[C].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003..
  • 4[日]富井利安.环境法的新展开[M].日本东京:法律文化社,1995..
  • 5周林彬.可持续发展与中国自然资源法制度创新[M].兰州:甘肃人民出版社,2000..
  • 6[美]诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994..
  • 7吴志良.财产权与环境保护[A]..创新环境资源法学,共建绿色新千年—2000年全国环境资源法学研讨会论文集[C].,2000..
  • 8吕忠梅.论环境物权[A]..探索·创新·发展·收获—2001年环境资源法学国际研讨会论文集[C].,2001..
  • 9[英]朱迪·丽丝.自然资源分配、经济学与政策[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002..
  • 10郑易生 钱薏红.从战略全局角度加强对我国生态补偿机制的研究[EB/OL].http://www.cass.net.cn.,.

共引文献61

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部