期刊文献+

城市轨道交通深基坑工程承压水风险与控制研究 被引量:10

Risk of the Artesian Water and Control Measurements for the Deep Excavation of Urban Rail Transit Engineering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着我国城市轨道交通建设发展,北京、上海、广州等特大型城市轨道交通线路网逐渐形成,出现不同线路交错、轨道交通线路与其他城市设施空间交叉等情况,这使得地下车站深度不断增加,深基坑工程受深部承压水风险日益突出。收集了27个承压水风险工程案例,统计分析了围护结构隔断或未隔断承压含水层等不同情况下,承压水风险与围护结构类型、承压含水层面覆土厚度等的相关性;采用故障树法探讨了深基坑工程坑底突涌、围护结构漏水、流砂等风险事件及风险因素,根据风险工程案例对承压水风险主次因素进行排列;结合工程实例应用分析,提出了承压水风险预防应对措施,提出了设置备用降压井和基坑开挖前试抽水试验等风险应对措施,为类似工程提供参考。 With the development of urban rail transit communication engineering in China,the rail transit network of megacities was gradually formed,such as Beijing,Shanghai and Guangzhou,and the transfers of different lines or the spatial crosses of the rail lines and the other city facilities were developed,therefor the depth of subway stations was increasing and the accidents caused by the artesian water were increasing meanwhile.In this paper,based on the twenty-seven cases,the relationship of the risk of the artesian water and the type of the retaining structure and the thickness of the soil above the artesian water,and the fault tree analysis was employed to identify and array the factors of the risk of the artesian water.Then,a case was discussed to propose the precautions and the emergency measurements of the risk of the artesian water for the deep excavation engineering.Finally,the measurements of the emergency dewatering wells and the pumping test before the excavation were proposed.
出处 《防灾减灾工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期617-623,共7页 Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering
基金 上海市科技人才计划项目(12XD1423000) 上海市科研计划项目(13231200700)资助
关键词 轨道交通工程 深基坑工程 承压水 风险 故障树分析法 控制措施 urban rail transit communication engineering deep excavation engineering artesian water risk fault tree analysis control measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献20

  • 1何锡兴,周红波,姚浩.上海某深基坑工程风险识别与模糊评估[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(B11):1912-1915. 被引量:66
  • 2MATSUO M, KAWAMURA K. A design method of deep excavation in cohesive soil based on the reliability theory[J]. Soils and foundations, 1980, 20(1): 61 --75.
  • 3BJERRUM L, EIDE O. Stability of strutted excavation in clay[J]. Geoteehnique,1996, 6(1): 32--47.
  • 4CHOI H H, CHO H N, SEO J W. Risk assessment methodology for underground construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2004, 3:258--272.
  • 5XU T H, BI S P, CHEN J R. Safety management of deep foundation pit based on construction risk analysis[C]// 2008 Isecs International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management. [S. 1.]: [s. n.], 2008, 3: 268--272.
  • 6HUCHZERMEIER A, LOCH C H. Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R & D[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47: 85--101.
  • 7WANG J C, HOU W H, WANG X Z. Analysis of accident and risk sources factors for deep foundation pit[J]. Progress in Safety Science and Technology, 2005, (5): 476--481.
  • 8梅启智 廖炯生 孙惠中.系统可靠性工程基础[M].北京:科学出版社,1992..
  • 9GOULIELMOS A M, KOSTAS GIZIAKIS. Risk of collisions and groundings in bulk carries and tankers[C]// The Proceedings of the Seventh International Off-shore and Polar Engineering Conference. USA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 1997:275 - 288.
  • 10FURUTA H, SHIRAISHI N. Fuzzy importance in Fault tree analysis[J]. Fuzzy Set and System,1984,12:205 - 213.

共引文献409

同被引文献91

引证文献10

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部