期刊文献+

莱辛对民族戏剧的认识与卢梭的内在关联

Lessing's and Rousseau's Understanding of National Dramatic Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 莱辛重视民族戏剧的教育功能,积极参与"德意志民族剧院"的建立与发展。与之相反,卢梭则极力反对在日内瓦建立剧院的主张,认为戏剧演出会败坏日内瓦公民的德性。然而,莱辛对民族戏剧的认识却与卢梭有着深层的联系,他一方面将卢梭关于怜悯的论述与亚里士多德的"恐惧与怜悯"进行了整合,另一方面将卢梭对戏剧的指责细划为对法国新古典主义戏剧的摒弃。他二人表面看似相反的观点,实际上体现了相同的构建自己国家民族认同的政治主张。 Lessing attached great importance to the educational function of national drama and was actively involved in the establishment and development of the Hamburg National Theatre. By contrast,Rousseau fiercely protested against the idea of establishing a theatre in Geneva. He believed that it would corrupt the virtue of Geneva citizens. However, Lessing’s understanding had an internal connection with that of Rousseau’s. On the one hand, Lessing integrated Rousseau’s comments on pity with Aristotle’s "eleos"and "phobos". On the other hand, he replaced the critique of neoclassical French drama with Rousseau’accusation against drama. Both Lessing and Rousseau expressed the same political ideas on how to build a national identification of their own country and people.
作者 王媛
机构地区 南京大学文学院
出处 《新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2015年第6期102-108,共7页 Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 莱辛 卢梭 民族戏剧 怜悯 教化 Lessing Rousseau National drama Pity Enlightenment
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1莱辛 张黎译.汉堡剧评[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1981..
  • 2莱辛.关于悲剧的通信[M].朱雁冰译,北京.华夏出版社,2010.
  • 3卢梭.论人类不平等的起源和基础[M].北京:商务印书馆,1962..
  • 4韦勒克.近代文学批评史[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1987、1988.
  • 5亚里斯多德.诗学[M].罗念生,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
  • 6阿伦特.黑暗时代的人们(王凌云译)[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2006.
  • 7刘小枫.中译本前言[M]//莱辛.关于悲剧的通信.朱雁冰,译.北京:华夏出版社,2010.
  • 8卢梭.致达朗贝尔的信[M].李平沤,译.北京:商务印书馆,2011.
  • 9柏拉图.理想国[M].王扬,译.北京:华夏出版社,2012.
  • 10ERICH A.Mimesis:The Representation of Reality in Western Literature[M].TRASK W R,Trans.Princeton,New Jersey:Princeton University,1968:389.

共引文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部