期刊文献+

Invariance and Scientific Representation

原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper argues for an invariantist view of scientific representation. First, it introduces the deflationary view that sees models in science as no different in essence from symbolic vehicles, which are derivative and adopted pragmatically, as a matter of convention. After analyzing this deflationary view and pointing out its shortcomings, it argues that representations play at least two radically different roles: one purely symbolic and therefore conventional, and the other epistemic. Finally, it argues that although it is correct to say that all particular external vehicles are introduced via some conventions, they get their jobs done because they are invariant with respect to particular conventions. This paper argues for an invariantist view of scientific representation. First, it introduces the deflationary view that sees models in science as no different in essence from symbolic vehicles, which are derivative and adopted pragmatically, as a matter of convention. After analyzing this deflationary view and pointing out its shortcomings, it argues that representations play at least two radically different roles: one purely symbolic and therefore conventional, and the other epistemic. Finally, it argues that although it is correct to say that all particular external vehicles are introduced via some conventions, they get their jobs done because they are invariant with respect to particular conventions.
作者 LIU Chuang
出处 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》 2015年第4期647-667,共21页 中国哲学前沿(英文版)
关键词 scientific representation MODEL representational vehicle IDEALIZATION INVARIANCE deflationism scientific representation model representational vehicle idealization invariance deflationism
分类号 C [社会学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Burgess, A. and Burgess, 1. P. 2011. Truth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 2Callender, C. & Cohen, 1. 2006. "There Is No Special Problem About Scientific Representation." Theoria 55: 7-25.
  • 3Freeman, W. 1. 1991. "The Physiology of Perception." Scientific American 264.2: 78-85.
  • 4Goodman, N. 1976. Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Hackett.
  • 5Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 6Hannan, G. 1973. Thoughts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 7Hesse, M. G. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • 8Hughes, R. I. G. 1997. "Models and Representation." Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): 325-36.
  • 9Liu, C. 1997. "Models and Theories I: The Semantic View Revisited." International Studies in the Philosophy of Science ll: 147-64.
  • 10Locke, 1. 1796. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, vol. 1, 20th ed. London: Thomas Longman.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部