期刊文献+

微创经皮肾穿刺输尿管镜碎石治疗复杂上尿路结石52例 被引量:6

Treatment of complicated upper urinary tract calculi by minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy ureteroscopy lithotripsy: report of 52 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨微创经皮肾穿刺输尿管镜碎石术(Min-PCNL)治疗复杂上尿路结石的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析微创经皮肾穿刺输尿管镜碎石术治疗复杂上尿路结石52例临床资料。结果 52例经手术均成功取石,Ⅰ期取石率92.3%(48/52),Ⅱ期取石4例。双通道取石8例。手术时间平均(84.2±3.5)min,平均出血(88.5±6.0)ml,肾造瘘管留置3~8 d(4.5±0.5)d,术后6~8 h进食,平均住院(5.5±0.5)d,全部患者未出现延迟性出血等严重并发症。结论该手术具有微创、恢复快、手术时间短、结石取净率高、安全可靠等优点,可作为复杂肾结石的首选治疗方法。 Objective To analyze and discuss the the efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy URSL( Min-PCNL) on complex urinary tract stones and its safety. Methods A retrospective analysis of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy URSL for complicated urinary tract stones was done on 52 patients. Results All the 52 patients were successful in removal of stones,with phase-1 removal rate of 92. 3%( 48 /52). Phase-2 removal of stones was performed in four patients,and removal of stones was completed via dual accesses in eight patients. Mean operation time was( 84. 2 ± 3. 5) min,average blood loss was( 88. 5 ± 6. 0) ml,nephrostomy catheter indwelling time was 3- 8( 4. 5 ± 0. 5) d,first time postoperative eating was at 6- 8 h after operation,and average length of stay in hospital was( 5. 5 ± 0. 5) d. Delayed bleeding and other serious complications did not occur in all the cases. Conclusion Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy is minimally invasive,safe and reliable. It can be used as the preferred method to treatment of complex urinary tract stones.
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2015年第5期447-449,共3页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
关键词 微创经皮肾镜术 输尿管镜碎石术 复杂上尿路结石 Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy Ureteroscopy lithotripsy Complex urinary tract stone
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献36

  • 1袁坚,吴开俊.经皮肾镜术并发大出血16例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1995,16(9):530-531. 被引量:103
  • 2周四维.输尿管上段结石的微创外科治疗[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(6):365-367. 被引量:108
  • 3[1]Khader E,Karmouni T,Ghorfi M N, et al. Our results with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Report of 61 cases. Ann Urol, 2000, 34:398-401.
  • 4[2]Zegel H G, Pollack M, Koolpe H, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy: comparison of sonographic and fluoro-scopic guidance. Am J Radiol, 1981, 137:925-927.
  • 5[3]Maheshwari P N, Andankar M G, Bansal M. Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large bore or pigtail catheter? J Endurol, 2000, 14: 735-737.
  • 6[2]Jackman S V, Docimo S G,Cadeddu J A,et al. The "mini-perc" technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol,1998, 16: 371-374.
  • 7Cecchetti W,Zattoni F,Nigro F,et a1.Plasma bubble formation induced by holmium laser an in vitro study[J].Urology,2004,63 (3):586-950.
  • 8邓程恩,陈勇,潘文博,等.标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的疗效对比[J].海南医学院学报,2012,18(3):373-374.
  • 9Albala D M,Assimos D G,Clayman R V,et al.Lower pole I:aprospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results[J].Jurol,2001,166(6):2072-2080.
  • 10Tomaszewski J J,Smaldone M C,Schuster T,et al.Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy using balloon dilation in a large contemporary series[J].J Endourol,2010,24(2):207-211.

共引文献1053

同被引文献59

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部