期刊文献+

Combined process of biofiltration and ozone oxidation as an advanced treatment process for wastewater reuse 被引量:7

Combined process of biofiltration and ozone oxidation as an advanced treatment process for wastewater reuse
原文传递
导出
摘要 The effluent of a wastewater treatment plant was treated in a pilot plant for reclaimed water production through the denitrification biofilter (DNBF) process, ozonation (O3), and biologic aerated filtration (BAF). The combined process demonstrated good removal performance of conventional pollutants, including con- centrations of chemical oxygen demand (27.8 mg·L^-1) and total nitrogen (9.9 mg·L^-1) in the final effluent, which met the local discharge standards and water reuse purposes. Micropollutants (e.g., antibiotics and endocrine-disrupting chemicals) were also significantly removed during the proposed process. Ozonation exhibited high antibiotic removal efficiencies, especially for tetracycline (94%). However, micropollutant removal efficiency was nega- tively affected by the nitrite produced by DNBF. Acute toxicity variations of the combined process were estimated by utilizing luminescent bacteria. Inhibition rate increased from 9% to 15% during ozonation. Carbonyl compound concentrations (e.g., aldehydes and ketones) also increased by 58% as by-products, which consequently increased toxicity. However, toxicity eventually became as low as that of the influent because the by-products were effectively removed by BAR The combined DNBF/O3/ BAF process is suitable for the advanced treatment of reclaimed water because it can thoroughly remove pollutants and toxicity. The effluent of a wastewater treatment plant was treated in a pilot plant for reclaimed water production through the denitrification biofilter (DNBF) process, ozonation (O3), and biologic aerated filtration (BAF). The combined process demonstrated good removal performance of conventional pollutants, including con- centrations of chemical oxygen demand (27.8 mg·L^-1) and total nitrogen (9.9 mg·L^-1) in the final effluent, which met the local discharge standards and water reuse purposes. Micropollutants (e.g., antibiotics and endocrine-disrupting chemicals) were also significantly removed during the proposed process. Ozonation exhibited high antibiotic removal efficiencies, especially for tetracycline (94%). However, micropollutant removal efficiency was nega- tively affected by the nitrite produced by DNBF. Acute toxicity variations of the combined process were estimated by utilizing luminescent bacteria. Inhibition rate increased from 9% to 15% during ozonation. Carbonyl compound concentrations (e.g., aldehydes and ketones) also increased by 58% as by-products, which consequently increased toxicity. However, toxicity eventually became as low as that of the influent because the by-products were effectively removed by BAR The combined DNBF/O3/ BAF process is suitable for the advanced treatment of reclaimed water because it can thoroughly remove pollutants and toxicity.
出处 《Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第6期1076-1083,共8页 环境科学与工程前沿(英文)
关键词 wastewater treatment micropollutantremoval OZONATION BIOFILTRATION TOXICITY wastewater treatment, micropollutantremoval, ozonation, biofiltration, toxicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献56

  • 1Huang M H, Li Y M, Gu G W (2008). The effects of hydraulic retention time and sludge retention time on the fate of DEHP in a laboratory-scale anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic activated sludge system. Bioresour Techno199, 8107-8111.
  • 2Koichi Soejima, Shinya Matsumoto, Satoshi Ohgushi (2008). Modeling and experimental study on the anaerobic/aerobic/anoxic process for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal: The effect of acetate addition. Process Biochem 43,605-614.
  • 3Baeza J A, Gabriel D, Lafuente J (2004). Effect of internal recycle on the nitrogen removal efficiency of an anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A^2O) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Process Biochem 39, 1615-1624.
  • 4Satoshi Tsuneda, Takashi Ohno, Koichi Soejima, et al. (2006). Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal using denitrifying phosphate-accumulating organisms in a sequencing batch reactor. Biochem Eng J 27, 191-196.
  • 5Adrian Oehmen, Paulo C L, Gilda C, et al. (2007). Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal: From micro to macro scale. Water Res 41, 2271-2300.
  • 6Yuan L M, Zhang C Y, Zhang Y Q, et al. (2008). Biological nutrient removal using an alternating of anoxic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AAAM) process. Desalination 221, 566-575.
  • 7Ankley G T, Burkhard L B (1992). Identification of surfactants as toxicants in a primary effluent. Environ Toxicol Chem 11 , 1235-1248.
  • 8Liu X W, He R, Shen D S (2008). Studies on the toxic effects of pentachlorophenol on the biological activity of anaerobic granular sludge. JEnviron Manag 88, 939-946.
  • 9Nasu M, Goto M, Kato H (2001) Study on endocrine disrupting chemicals in wastewater treatment plants. Wat Sci Tech 43, 101-108.
  • 10Doerger J U, Meier R A, Dobbs R A, et al. (2002). Toxicity reduction evaluation at a municipal wastewater treatment plant using mutagenicity as an endpoint. Arch Environ Contam Toxico122, 384-388.

共引文献16

同被引文献43

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部