期刊文献+

基于下偏矩的期货对冲模型及实证研究 被引量:2

The Future Hedging Model Based on LPM and Empirical Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用沪深300指数及期货的日交易数据,探讨下偏矩模型下的空头期货最优对冲比率,及样本内外的对冲绩效和组合收益率。结论显示,风险参数和目标收益率在形成下偏矩模型的对冲策略上,存在显著影响。其中,下偏矩最优对冲比率是目标收益率的增函数,是风险参数的减函数;在较高的风险厌恶程度、特别是较低的目标回报率条件下,下偏矩模型样本内外的对冲绩效都有良好表现。从而,下偏矩模型更加适合高风险厌恶或者低目标回报的对冲者,但以对冲组合收益率的下降为代价。 With daily trading data from the Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 index and the futures, this paper estimates the optimal LPM hedging ratios (OHR), and evaluates the hedging performance and portfolio returns in-sample and out-of-sample. The empirical study of short hedging strategy concludes that: (1) the risk parameter and target returns have significant influence in forming the hedging strategy of LPM model. Among which the optimal hedging ratios are the increasing function of target returns, and the decreasing function of risk parameter. (2) on the condition of higher risk averse and specially the lower target returns, there is fine hedging performance insample and out-of-sample. This paper concludes the LPM model is suit for hedger with higher risk averse and lower target returns, and with the cost of the declining hedging portfolios returns.
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期32-37,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71472091 71172041) 江苏省高校实验室研究会2012年度立项研究课题(20120111) 教育部人文社科项目(14YJC790140)
关键词 最优对冲比率 下偏矩模型 沪深300指数期货 风险管理 Optimal Hedging Ratios Lower Partial Moments Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 Index Futures Risk Management
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Barberis N ,Shleifer A,Vishny R. A model of investor sentiment[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, (49):307-343.
  • 2Benartzi S, Thaler R H. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995,110 (1) :75-92.
  • 3Markovitz H M. Portfolio selection:Efficient diver- sification of investments [M]. New York: Wiley Sons, 1959.
  • 4Fishburn P J. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns [J]. American Economic Review, 1977,67(2) : 116- 126.
  • 5Bawa V S. Safety-first, stochastic dominance and optimal portfolio choice [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1978,33 ( 1 ) : 25- 71.
  • 6Brogan A J, Stidham S. Non-separation in the mean-lower-partial-moment portfolio optimization problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008. 184(2) : 701- 710.
  • 7Cheng S, et al. Progress in risk measurement [J]. Advanced Modelling and Optimization, 2004,6 (1) : 1 -20.
  • 8Lien D, Tse Y K. Some recent developments in futures hedging [J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2002,16(3) : 357- 396.
  • 9Lien D, Tse Y K. Hedging downside risk with futures contracts [J]. Applied Financial Economics, 2000,10(2) : 163- 170.
  • 10Lien D, Tse Y K. Hedging downside risk: futures vs. options [J]. International Review of Economics and Finance,2001,10(3) :159-169.

二级参考文献70

共引文献40

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部