期刊文献+

自粘接树脂水门汀对口腔修复用材料剪切粘接强度的实验研究

The effect of Multilink Speed self-adhesive resin cement on the shear bond strength of oral cavity repair materials
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:测试Multilink Speed自粘接树脂水门汀对口腔修复用不同材料剪切粘接强度的影响。方法:用4种临床常用的修复材料(高强度玻璃陶瓷,金属烤瓷,镍铬合金,树脂)制作统一标准试样。将试样用Multilink Speed自粘接树脂水门汀粘接。用万能材料试验机测试粘接强度。结果:各种修复材料的剪切粘接强度平均值为高强度玻璃陶瓷(21.5±6.5)MPa,镍铬合金(9.6±3.2)MPa,金属烤瓷(10.9±4.2)MPa,树脂(17.8±8.3)MPa。自粘接树脂水门汀在高强度玻璃陶瓷和树脂组产生的剪切粘接强度高于金属烤瓷组(P<0.05),也高于金属烤瓷组(P<0.05)。结论:Multilink Speed自粘接树脂水门汀对高强度玻璃陶瓷及树脂的粘接强度高于对金属烤瓷及镍铬合金的粘接强度。 Objective:to compare the shear bond strength(SBS) of Multilink Speed self-adhesive resin cement on various materials for oral cavity repair. Methods:the standard sample was made of four common materials used in clinical settings, including high strength glass ceramics, metal porcelain, nickel-chromium alloy and resin. The universal testing machine was adopted to assess the bonding strength when all samples were bonded by Multilink Speed self-adhesive resin cement.Results:the average of shear bond strength of the four materials were 21.5±6.5 MPa,(9.6±3.2) MPa,(10.9±4.2) MPa and(17.8±8.3) MPa for high strength glass ceramics, metal porcelain, nickel-chromium alloy and resin, separately. The higher SBSwere observed in both high strength glass ceramics and resin groups, compared to that in either metal porcelain group(P〈0.05) or nickel-chromium alloy group(P〈0.05). Self-adhesive resin cement in high-strength glass ceramic and resin produced than metal porcelain group also higher than the metal ceramic group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: multilink Speed self-adhesive resin cement has a better bonding strength on high strength glass ceramics and resin in comparison to metal ceramic and nickel-chromium alloy.
作者 杨晓庆 苏健
出处 《医疗装备》 2015年第17期4-6,共3页 Medical Equipment
关键词 自粘接树脂水门汀 剪切粘接强度 口腔修复用材料 self-adhesive resin cement shear bond strength materials for oral cavity repair
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献75

  • 1张玮,姚畅旺,韩栋伟.表面处理对Cercon氧化锆陶瓷黏结强度的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2007,23(2):272-275. 被引量:23
  • 2Andersson M,Oden A (1993).A new all-ceramic crown.A dense-sintered,high-purity alumina coping with porcelain.Acta Odontol Scand,51(1):59-64.
  • 3Anusavice KJ (1993).Recent developments in restorative dental ceramics.J Am Dent Assoc,124(2):72-74,76-78,80-74.
  • 4Atsu SS,Kilicarslan MA,Kucukesmen HC,Aka PS (2006).Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.J Prosthet Dent,95(6):430-436.
  • 5Blatz MB,Chiehe G,Holst S,Sadan A (2007).Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia.Quintessence Int,38(9):745-753.
  • 6de Munck J,Vargas M,van Landuyt K,Hikita K,Lambrechts P,van Meerbeek B (2004).Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin.Dent Mater,20(10):963-971.
  • 7de Oyague RC,Monticelli F,Toledano M,Osorio E,Ferrari M,Osorio R (2009).Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic.Dent Mater,25(2):172-179.
  • 8Derand P,Derand T (2000).Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics.Int J Prosthodont,13(2):131-135.
  • 9Derand T,Molin M,Kvam K (2005).Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces.Dent Mater,21(12):1158-1162.
  • 10Ernst CP,Cohnen U,Stender E,Willershausen B (2005).In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents,J Prosthet Dent,93(6):551-558.

共引文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部