期刊文献+

论药品监管中的先行登记保存

Discussions on advanced registration and preservation in drug administration
原文传递
导出
摘要 涉药违法案件的认定往往依赖于检验,然而抽样取证阶段,有些证据可能会面临损毁灭失而以后难以取得的情况,故先行登记保存在药品监管中被广泛采用。由于其法律性质不清,加之过于原则、粗放式的立法现状,导致在实践中使用"先行登记保存"替代"查封、扣押"的;或者挖掘"先行登记保存"弥补不具有行政强制调查法律资源的现象频出,针对这些现象的发生机理,本文提出了完善的路径和建议。 The identification of cases involving illegal drug often depends on testing. However, in the process of sampling and evidence obtaining, there exists a situation where some evidence may be damaged and difficult to be obtained afterwards. Therefore, advanced registration and preservation is widely used in drug supervision and administration. Because the legal nature of the advanced registration and preservation is unclear, coupled with rather principled, extensive legislative situation, the phenomena that the use of the advanced registration and preservation substitutes for attachment or seizure in practice and that the advanced registration and preservation makes up for not having the legal resources of administrative mandatory investigation emerge frequently. In view of the current situation, this paper puts forward suggestions and the path to change.
作者 李筱永
出处 《证据科学》 CSSCI 2015年第6期721-733,共13页 Evidence Science
基金 北京市社会科学基金青年项目"卫生行政强制法律制度研究:以北京市为例"(编号:13FXC042)
关键词 药品监管 先行登记保存 法律性质 可诉性 Drug administration Advanced registration and preservation Legal nature Actionablity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部