期刊文献+

三维声强阵列测试精度的对比及数值分析

Comparison and Numerical Analysis of Measurement Accuracy of Two Three-Dimensional Sound Intensity Arrays
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对四面体及六传声器布置形式的声强阵列测试精度进行数值计算,比较了两种阵列的幅值测量误差及方向判断误差,并通过消声室的测试分析验证数值计算结果.研究结果表明:随着频率的升高,声强测量的幅值误差也相应增加;声强阵列的半径小于0.012 7 m时,频率为6 k Hz时两者测量幅值误差均超过2 d B.在方向性误差判断方面,四传声器比六传声器存在较大的优势.在kd(波数与传声器声强阵列半径的积)小于1.6时,四传声器声强阵列的方向误差判别小于1°.四传声器声强阵列降低了声强测量的硬件系统要求,但在中频阶段完全可以用于相关的建筑声学测试. In this paper,the measurement accuracies of the sound intensity arrays of the tetrahedral and six-microphone arrangements are numerically predicted,and the measured amplitude and angle biases of the two arrays are compared. Then,the numerical results are verified by a test in an anechoic room. The results show that( 1) the measured amplitude errors of the two arrays increase with the frequency,and they are both greater than 2 d B when the frequency is 6 k Hz and the sound intensity array radius is less than 0. 012 7 m;( 2) the tetrahedron is significantly superior to the six microphone in terms of the angle bias,and the angle bias of the tetrahedron is less than 1°when kd( the product of the wave number and the sound intensity array radius) is less than 1. 6; and( 3) the tetrahedral sound intensity array reduces the requirement for the hardware system of the sound intensity measurement and can be used in relevant architecture acoustical measurements at the intermediate frequency stage.
作者 王红卫 张龙
出处 《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期74-79,88,共7页 Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51278198) 国家留学基金资助项目(201308440043) 华南理工大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2014zz0021)~~
关键词 三维声强 数值计算 方向判定 测试精度 three-dimensional sound intensity numerical calculation direction judgment measurement accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1GB/T 19889.3—2005 声学 建筑和建筑构件隔声测量 第3部分:建筑构件空气声隔声的实验室测量[S].
  • 2GB/T19889.4-2005,声学建筑和建筑构件隔声测量第4部分:房间之间空气声隔声的现场测量[S].
  • 3黄险峰.楼板隔绝撞击噪声的预测[J].噪声与振动控制,2008,28(4):138-140. 被引量:2
  • 4Suzuki H, Anzai M, Oguro S, et al. Performance evaluation of a three dimensional intensity probe [ J ]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 1995 (16) :233-238.
  • 5Suzuki H, Oguro S, Ono T. A sensitivity correction method for a three-dimensional sound intensity probe [ J]. Acous- tical Science & Technology,2000(21 ) :259-265.
  • 6Hickling R, Brown A. Determining the direction to a sound source in air using vector sound-intensity probes [ J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2011, 129:219-224.
  • 7Finn Jacobsen. A comparison of two different sound inten- sity measurement principles [ J ]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2005,118 : 1510-1517.
  • 8Basten T, Bree de G. Full bandwidth calibration procedure for acoustic probes containing a pressure and particle ve- locity sensor [ J ]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of A- merica, 2010,127 : 264- 270.
  • 9Bree H. The Microflown:an acoustic particle velocity sen- sor [ J ]. Acoustics Australia, 2003,31 : 91- 94.
  • 10Wiederhold Curtis P, Gee Kent L, Blotter Jonathan D, et al. Comparison of multimicrophone probe design and pro- cessing methods in measuring acoustic intensity [J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2014,135 : 2797-2807.

二级参考文献4

  • 1骆涛.住宅浮筑楼板隔声技术及应用[J].住宅科技,2006,26(3):52-54. 被引量:15
  • 2秦佑国.统计能量分析应用于墙隔声的研究[J].声学学报,1982,7(4):106-10.
  • 3R. J. M. Craik, Advanced Building Acoustics, Heriot-Watt University [ M ]. 2000,38 - 48.
  • 4黄险峰.应用Matlab编程计算建筑构件的计权隔声量[J].全国环境声学、电磁辐射环境学术会议论文集,中国三亚,2004,12:建筑声学部分:8-13.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部