期刊文献+

Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer:current status and perspectives 被引量:3

Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer:current status and perspectives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The laparoscopic approach for treatment of rectal cancer has been proven feasible and oncologically safe, and is able to offer better short-term outcomes than traditional open procedures, mainly in terms of reduced length of hospital stay and time to return to working activity. In spite of this, the laparoscopic technique is usually practised only in high-volume experienced centres, mainly because it requires a prolonged and demanding learning curve. It has been estimated that over 50 operations are required for an experienced colorectal surgeon to achieve proficiency with this technique. Robotic surgery enables the surgeon to perform minimally invasive operations with better vision and more intuitive and precise control of the operating instruments, thus promising to overcome some of the technical difficulties associated with standard laparoscopy. It has high-definition threedimensional vision, it translates the surgeon's hand movements into precise movements of the instruments inside the patient, the camera is held and moved by the first surgeon, and a fourth robotic arm is available as a fixed retractor. The aim of this review is to summarise the current data on clinical and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in rectal cancer, focusing on short- and long-term results, and providing original data from the authors' centre. The laparoscopic approach for treatment of rectal cancer has been proven feasible and oncologically safe, and is able to offer better short-term outcomes than traditional open procedures, mainly in terms of reduced length of hospital stay and time to return to working activity. In spite of this, the laparoscopic technique is usually practised only in high-volume experienced centres, mainly because it requires a prolonged and demanding learning curve. It has been estimated that over 50 operations are required for an experienced colorectal surgeon to achieve proficiency with this technique. Robotic surgery enables the surgeon to perform minimally invasive operations with better vision and more intuitive and precise control of the operating instruments, thus promising to overcome some of the technical difficulties associated with standard laparoscopy. It has high-definition threedimensional vision, it translates the surgeon's hand movements into precise movements of the instruments inside the patient, the camera is held and moved by the first surgeon, and a fourth robotic arm is available as a fixed retractor. The aim of this review is to summarise the current data on clinical and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in rectal cancer, focusing on short- and long-term results, and providing original data from the authors' centre.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第2期546-556,共11页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 RECTAL cancer ROBOTIC total mesorectalexcision ROBOTIC surgery ROBOTIC RESECTION Circumferentialresection MARGIN LYMPH node yield Distalresection MARGIN POSITIVITY Rectal cancer Robotic total mesorectal excision Robotic surgery Robotic resection Circumferential resection margin Lymph node yield Distal resection margin positivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献63

  • 1Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectalcancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence- Br J Surg 1982; 69:613-616 [PMID: 6751457 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800691019].
  • 2Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after totalmesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 1: 1479-1482[PMID: 2425199 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2].
  • 3Allaix ME, Fichera A. Modern rectal cancer multidisciplinarytreatment: the role of radiation and surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20: 2921-2928 [PMID: 23604783].
  • 4NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines on Oncology (NCCNGuidelines). Rectal Cancer. Version 3. (2012). Available from:URL: http://www.NCCN.org.
  • 5Siegel R, Cuesta MA, Targarona E, Bader FG, Morino M,Corcelles R, Lacy AM, P-hlman L, Haglind E, Bujko K, BruchHP, Heiss MM, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopicextraperitoneal rectal cancer surgery: the clinical practiceguidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery(EAES). Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2423-2440 [PMID: 21701921].
  • 6Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-termoncologic results. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 54-61 [PMID: 19561481DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6511].
  • 7Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP.Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologicadequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. IntJ Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 415-421 [PMID: 21174107 DOI:10.1007/s00384-010-1091-6].
  • 8Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS, Mak TW, Leung WW,Leung KL. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versusopen surgery for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 randomizedcontrolled trials. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 139-147 [PMID: 23598381DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828fe119].
  • 9Kayano H, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Tanigawa N. Evaluationof the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection forrectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2972-2979 [PMID: 21512883DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1655-8].
  • 10Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Luo R, Pigazzi A, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ.Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends.Arch Surg 2012; 147: 724-731 [PMID: 22508667].

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部