期刊文献+

Technical feasibility of laparoscopic extended surgerybeyond total mesorectal excision for primary or recurrentrectal cancer 被引量:10

Technical feasibility of laparoscopic extended surgery beyond total mesorectal excision for primary or recurrent rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Relatively little is known about the oncologic safety of laparoscopic surgery for advanced rectal cancer.Recently, large randomized clinical trials showed that laparoscopic surgery was not inferior to open surgery, as evidenced by survival and local control rates. However, patients with T4 tumors were excluded from these trials. Technological advances in the instrumentation and techniques used by laparoscopic surgery have increased the use of laparoscopic surgery for advanced rectal cancer. High-definition, illuminated, and magnified images obtained by laparoscopy may enable more precise laparoscopic surgery than open techniques, even during extended surgery for T4 or locally recurrent rectal cancer. To date, the quality of evidence regarding the usefulness of laparoscopy for extended surgery beyond total mesorectal excision has been low because most studies have been uncontrolled series, with small sample sizes, and long-term data are lacking. Nevertheless, laparoscopic extended surgery for rectal cancer, when performed by specialized laparoscopic colorectal surgeons, has been reported safe in selected patients, with significant advantages, including a clear visual field and less blood loss. This review summarizes current knowledge on laparoscopic extended surgery beyond total mesorectal excision for primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer. Relatively little is known about the oncologic safety of laparoscopic surgery for advanced rectal cancer.Recently, large randomized clinical trials showed that laparoscopic surgery was not inferior to open surgery, as evidenced by survival and local control rates. However, patients with T4 tumors were excluded from these trials. Technological advances in the instrumentation and techniques used by laparoscopic surgery have increased the use of laparoscopic surgery for advanced rectal cancer. High-definition, illuminated, and magnified images obtained by laparoscopy may enable more precise laparoscopic surgery than open techniques, even during extended surgery for T4 or locally recurrent rectal cancer. To date, the quality of evidence regarding the usefulness of laparoscopy for extended surgery beyond total mesorectal excision has been low because most studies have been uncontrolled series, with small sample sizes, and long-term data are lacking. Nevertheless, laparoscopic extended surgery for rectal cancer, when performed by specialized laparoscopic colorectal surgeons, has been reported safe in selected patients, with significant advantages, including a clear visual field and less blood loss. This review summarizes current knowledge on laparoscopic extended surgery beyond total mesorectal excision for primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第2期718-726,共9页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Rectal cancer Total mesorectal EXCISION LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY EXTENDED SURGERY Lateral pelviclymph node dissection PELVIC EXENTERATION Rectal cancer Total mesorectal excision Laparoscopic surgery Extended surgery Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection Pelvic exenteration
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colonresection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1:144-150 [PMID: 1688289].
  • 2Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Acomparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomyfor colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-2059 [PMID:15141043 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651].
  • 3Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, HaglindE, Plman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, BonjerHJ. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery forcolon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 44-52 [PMID: 19071061 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3].
  • 4Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM,Heath RM, Brown JM. Short-term endpoints of conventionalversus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectalcancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlledtrial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-1726 [PMID: 15894098 DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2].
  • 5Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, SmithAM, Heath RM, Brown JM. Randomized trial of laparoscopicassistedresection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UKMRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3061-3068[PMID: 17634484 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758].
  • 6Denost Q, Adam JP, Pontallier A, Celerier B, Laurent C, Rullier E.Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosisfor rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 138-143 [PMID: 25185482DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000855].
  • 7Lujan J, Valero G, Biondo S, Espin E, Parrilla P, Ortiz H.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of aprospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients. Surg Endosc 2013;27: 295-302 [PMID: 22736289 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2444-8].
  • 8Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Pugely AJ, Heise CP, FoleyEF, Kennedy GD. Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assistedproctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP. J AmColl Surg 2011; 212: 844-854 [PMID: 21414814 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.005].
  • 9Penninckx F, Kartheuser A, Van de Stadt J, Pattyn P, Mansvelt B,Bertrand C, Van Eycken E, Jegou D, Fieuws S. Outcome followinglaparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1368-1375 [PMID: 23939849 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9211].
  • 10Kuroyanagi H, Akiyoshi T, Oya M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M,Yamaguchi T, Muto T. Laparoscopic-assisted anterior resectionwith double-stapling technique anastomosis: safe and feasible forlower rectal cancer- Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2197-2202 [PMID:19116740 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0260-y].

同被引文献54

引证文献10

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部