期刊文献+

Risk factors of biliary intervention by imaging after livingdonor liver transplantation 被引量:4

Risk factors of biliary intervention by imaging after living donor liver transplantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To determine the risk factors of biliary intervention using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) after living donor liver transplantation(LDLT).METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 196 patients who underwent right lobe LDLT between 2006 and 2010 at a single liver transplantation center. Direct duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis was performed in all 196 patients. MRCP images routinely taken 1 mo after LDLT were analyzed to identify risk factors for biliary intervention during follow-up, such as retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the MRCP findings, including the anastomosis site angle on three-dimensional images, the length of the filling defect on maximum intensity projection, bile duct dilatation, biliary stricture, and leakage.RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients underwent biliary intervention during follow-up. The anastomosis site angle [hazard ratio(HR) = 0.48; 95% confidence interval(CI), 0.30-0.75, P < 0.001], a filling defect in the anastomosis site(HR = 2.18, 95%CI: 1.41-3.38,P = 0.001), and biliary leakage(HR = 2.52, 95%CI: 1.02-6.20, P = 0.048) on MRCP were identified in the multivariate analysis as significant risk factors for biliary intervention during follow-up. Moreover, a narrower anastomosis site angle(i.e., below the median angle of 113.3°) was associated with earlier biliary intervention(38.5 ± 4.2 mo vs 62. 1 ± 4.1 mo, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing biliary intervention-free survival according to the anastomosis site angle revealed that lower survival was associated with a narrower anastomosis site angle(36.3% vs 62.0%, P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: The biliary anastomosis site angle in MRCP after LDLT may be associated with the need for biliary intervention. AIM:To determine the risk factors of biliary intervention using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) after living donor liver transplantation(LDLT).METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 196 patients who underwent right lobe LDLT between 2006 and 2010 at a single liver transplantation center. Direct duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis was performed in all 196 patients. MRCP images routinely taken 1 mo after LDLT were analyzed to identify risk factors for biliary intervention during follow-up, such as retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the MRCP findings, including the anastomosis site angle on three-dimensional images, the length of the filling defect on maximum intensity projection, bile duct dilatation, biliary stricture, and leakage.RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients underwent biliary intervention during follow-up. The anastomosis site angle [hazard ratio(HR) = 0.48; 95% confidence interval(CI), 0.30-0.75, P < 0.001], a filling defect in the anastomosis site(HR = 2.18, 95%CI: 1.41-3.38,P = 0.001), and biliary leakage(HR = 2.52, 95%CI: 1.02-6.20, P = 0.048) on MRCP were identified in the multivariate analysis as significant risk factors for biliary intervention during follow-up. Moreover, a narrower anastomosis site angle(i.e., below the median angle of 113.3°) was associated with earlier biliary intervention(38.5 ± 4.2 mo vs 62. 1 ± 4.1 mo, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing biliary intervention-free survival according to the anastomosis site angle revealed that lower survival was associated with a narrower anastomosis site angle(36.3% vs 62.0%, P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: The biliary anastomosis site angle in MRCP after LDLT may be associated with the need for biliary intervention.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第7期2342-2348,共7页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Magnetic resonance CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY Liver transplantation Living donor BILIARY INTERVENTION Endoscopic RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC biliarydrainage Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography Liver transplantation Living donor Biliary intervention Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Ryu CH, Lee SK. Biliary strictures after liver transplantation.Gut Liver 2011; 5: 133-142 [PMID: 21814591 DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.2.133].
  • 2Gastaca M. Biliary complications after orthotopic livertransplantation: a review of incidence and risk factors. TransplantProc 2012; 44: 1545-1549 [PMID: 22841209 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.05.008].
  • 3Katz LH, Benjaminov O, Belinki A, Geler A, Braun M,Knizhnik M, Aizner S, Shaharabani E, Sulkes J, Shabtai E,Pappo O, Atar E, Tur-Kaspa R, Mor E, Ben-Ari Z. Magneticresonance cholangiopancreatography for the accurate diagnosisof biliary complications after liver transplantation: comparisonwith endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and percutaneoustranshepatic cholangiography - long-term follow-up. ClinTransplant 2010; 24: E163-E169 [PMID: 21039885 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01300.x].
  • 4Arain MA, Attam R, Freeman ML. Advances in endoscopicmanagement of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation.Liver Transpl 2013; 19: 482-498 [PMID: 23417867DOI: 10.1002/lt.23624].
  • 5Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Hashimoto D. Biliary reconstruction,its complications and management of biliary complications afteradult liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence,risk factors and outcome. Transpl Int 2011; 24: 379-392 [PMID:21143651 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01202.x].
  • 6Nemes B, Gámán G, Doros A. Biliary complications after livertransplantation. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 9:447-466 [PMID: 25331256 DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2015.967761].
  • 7Wachs ME, Bak TE, Karrer FM, Everson GT, Shrestha R, TrouillotTE, Mandell MS, Steinberg TG, Kam I. Adult living donor livertransplantation using a right hepatic lobe. Transplantation 1998;66: 1313-1316 [PMID: 9846514].
  • 8Testa G, Malagó M, Valentín-Gamazo C, Lindell G, Broelsch CE.Biliary anastomosis in living related liver transplantation using theright liver lobe: techniques and complications. Liver Transpl 2000;6: 710-714 [PMID: 11084056 DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2000.18706].
  • 9Na GH, Kim DG, Choi HJ, Han JH, Hong TH, You YK.Interventional treatment of a biliary stricture after adult right-lobeliving-donor liver transplantation with duct-to-duct anastomosis.HPB (Oxford) 2014; 16: 312-319 [PMID: 23981034 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12151].
  • 10Riediger C, Müller MW, Michalski CW, Hüser N, Schuster T,Kleeff J, Friess H. T-Tube or no T-tube in the reconstruction ofthe biliary tract during orthotopic liver transplantation: systematicreview and meta-analysis. Liver Transpl 2010; 16: 705-717 [PMID:20517904 DOI: 10.1002/lt.22070].

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部