争论中的“基因政治学”:理论、方法与范式

Genopolitics in Controversy: Theory,Method and Paradigm

长期以来,在政治学的研究中,众多学者先验地认为人类是独特的,而社会差别是由社会环境造成的。他们倾向于将文化与天性分开来看,甚至将两者对立起来。正是在这种"社会学习路径"的影响下,亚里士多德著名论断中"人是天生的政治动物"中人类本性的部分被有意或无意地忽视了。然而,随着"基因政治学"的兴起,"先天的思想"的观点已经在很大程度上被西方政治学界所接受,至少它已经成为了政治学的一个新兴研究领域,并日益冲击着西方政治学的学科视野和学科边界。鉴于此,本文就以这一方兴未艾的"基因政治学"为研究对象,重点分析其发生与发展的由来、理论的主要内涵、主要的研究方法,以及研究范式对政治学这一学科研究的突破性,同时也进一步展望其未来发展的导向与路径。

For a long time,in the domain of political science research,a large number of scholars instinctively believe that the human being is unique and social difference is caused by social environment. They tend to consider the culture and nature separately and even put them in the opposite positions. Under the influence of the deeply ingrained social learning approach many scholars intentionally or unintentionally ignore one of Aristotle＇s famous judgments — Man is by Nature a Political Animal. However,with the rise of genopolitics,the viewpoint of innate ideology has been largely accepted in the field of Western political science. At least it has become an emerging field of political science,and gets increasing impact on the disciplinary perspective and boundary. In view of these facts, this paper takes genopolitics as the object of study,analyzes its origin,main connotation,main research methods,research paradigm,and its breakthrough for political science. Finally, the orientation and approach of genopolitics in its future development is also prospected.