期刊文献+

我院伊立替康用于晚期恶性肿瘤致不良反应56例分析 被引量:7

Analysis of 56 cases of ADR Induced by Irinotecan in Advanced Malignant Cancer Patients of Our Hospital
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨临床应用伊立替康致药品不良反应(ADR)发生的特点及规律,为临床合理用药提供参考。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,收集2011年6月-2015年1月我院应用伊立替康的56例晚期恶性肿瘤患者出现ADR的相关信息,按照性别、年龄、病种、美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分、用药情况、ADR累及器官/系统、临床表现以及转归情况等进行描述性统计分析。结果:56例患者发生ADR累及器官/系统以骨髓造血系统所占比例最高(100%),其次为消化系统;其中Ⅰ~Ⅱ级ADR占87.20%,Ⅲ~Ⅳ级ADR占12.80%。64.50%的ADR在用药1周内发生。ADR转归情况方面,85.71%(48/56)的患者给予支持治疗后恢复,继续后续周期化疗,其余8例给予药物减量并对症治疗后好转。结论:伊立替康采用规范化疗方案给药剂量,其临床耐受性良好,ADR多数表现轻微且对症处理均可恢复。应加强对患者随访,防止严重ADR的发生。 OBJECTIVE:To explore the characteristics and regularities of the adverse drug reactions(ADRs)induced by irinotecan,in order to provide reference for clinical application. METHODS:In retrospective study,56 cases of irinotecan-induced ADR collected from our hospital during Jun. 2011-Jan.2015 were analyzed statistically in respects of gender,age,disease types,ECOG score,medication,organs/systems involved in ADR,clinical manifestations,outcome,etc. RESULTS:All 56 patients suffered from ADR,among which the percentage of hematopoietic system accounted for the highest(100%),and followed by digestive system;the grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ ADRs accounted for 87.20%,the grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ ADRs accounted for 12.80%. 64.50% of ADRs occurred within 1 week. In respect of conversion,85.71%(48/56)of the patients recovered with supportive care and continued chemotherapy,the remaining 8 cases had to reduce the dose of chemotherapy and then recovered. CONCLUSIONS:With regular dose,irinotecan is well tolerated. Since ADRs induced by irinotecan are slight,all the ADRs are well managed. It is important to enhance follow-up observations of patients to prevent some serious ADRs.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第5期635-637,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 伊立替康 药品不良反应 合理用药 分析 Irinotecan Adverse drug reactions Rational drug use Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Torino F,Sarmiento R,Gasparini G.The contribution of targeted therapy to the neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectalcancer[J].Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2013,87(3):283.
  • 2Mack PC,Gandara DR,Lara PN Jr.Efficacy and toxicity differences in lung cancer populations in the era of clinical trials globalization:the“common arm”approach[J].Expert Rev Anticancer Ther,2012,12(12):1 591.
  • 3Nagao S,Miwa M,Maeda N,et al.Clinical features of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix:a single-institution retrospective review[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer,2015,25(7):1 300.
  • 4Huisman SA,Bijman-Lagcher W,IJzermans JN,et al.Fasting protects against the side effects of irinotecan but preserves its anti-tumoreffect in Apc15lox mutant mice[J].Cell Cycle,2015,14(14):2 333.
  • 5李博,高蕊,李睿,陆芳,訾明杰,李庆娜,唐旭东.药物临床试验不良反应/不良事件关联性判定方法研究探讨[J].中国新药杂志,2014,23(12):1465-1470. 被引量:158
  • 6Iwamoto S,Hazama S,Kato T,et al.Multicenter phaseⅡstudy of second-line cetuximab plus folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan(FOLFIRI)in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer:the FLIER study[J].Anticancer Res,2014,34(4):1 967.
  • 7Yoshino T,Yamazaki K,Gotoh M,et al.Safety and pharmacokinetics of second-line ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma[J].Anticancer Res,2015,35(7):4 003.
  • 8Dias MM,Mc Kinnon RA,Sorich MJ.Impact of the UGT1A1*28 allele on response to irinotecan:a systematic reviewand meta-analysis[J].Pharmacogenomics,2012,13(8):889.
  • 9Kurucu N,Sari N,Ilhan IE.Irinotecan and temozolamide treatment for relapsed Ewing sarcoma:a single-center experience and review of the literature[J].Pediatr Hematol Oncol,2015,32(1):50.
  • 10林莉,徐建明,王岩,葛飞娇,刘烈军,赵传华,李珊珊,刘建芝,李志强.贝伐单抗联合伊立替康为主方案一线治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2010,32(10):786-790. 被引量:8

二级参考文献25

  • 1杜文民,王永铭,程能能.药物不良反应的判定与其研究方法(续一)[J].中国药物警戒,2004,1(2):17-20. 被引量:16
  • 2徐建明.大肠癌内科治疗现状的认识和评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(12):705-707. 被引量:13
  • 3黄宇虹,张伯礼.单一事件药物不良反应的因果关系评价[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2007,12(6):697-699. 被引量:4
  • 4田少雷,邵庆翔.药物临床试验与GCP实用指南[M].2版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2010:31.
  • 5SACKETT DL. Clinical Epidemilogy [ M ]. 2nd. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1991:297 - 299.
  • 6The Uppsala Monitoring Centre(the UMC). Safety monitoring of medicinal products:guidelines for setting up and running a phar- macovigilance center[ EB/OL]. [ 2013 - 11 - 15 ]. http ://apps. who. int/medicinedocs/en/d/Jh2934e/15, html.
  • 7EDWARDS IR, BIRIELL C. Harmonisation in pharmacovigi- lance[ J]. Drug Safety,1994,10(2) :93 -102.
  • 8BEGAUD B, EVREUX JC, JOUGLARD J, et al. Unexpected ortoxic drug reaction assessment (imputation). Actualisation of the method used in France[ J]. Therapie, 1985,40 : 111 - 118.
  • 9MEYBOOM RH, HEKSTER YA, EGBERTS AC, et al. Causal or casual? The role of causality assessment in pharmacovigilance [J]. Drug Safety,1997,17(6) :374 -389.
  • 10MEYBOOM RH, EGBERTS AC, EDWARDS IR, et al. Princi- ples of signal detection in pharmacovigilanee [ J ]. Drug Safety, 1997,16(6) :355 - 365.

共引文献164

同被引文献115

引证文献7

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部