期刊文献+

从设计的技术研究到设计的哲学研究 被引量:13

From the Technological Research on Design To the Philosophical Research on Design
原文传递
导出
摘要 设计可被视为人类社会中的一个具有开放性的技术认知与实践系统,可以从哲学的不同层次与不同视角对其进行观察和思考,使设计哲学成为当代科学哲学与技术哲学的整体性发展的可行径路。在认识论视域内,设计存在论是设计本质论的前提;在实践论视域内,设计本质论是设计存在论的前提。人们对设计的科学的认知从经验层次逐步迈向了理论层次,同时逐渐形成了设计自身的理论方法,并将其贯穿于设计手段和实践之中。设计中的思维与行为的互动发展历程始终是围绕着"整体和部分"、"手段和目的"、"主体与客体"等范畴展开的。 The Design can be viewed as a kind of system on technological cognition and practice, and could be observed and cogitated from different levels and view angles in the field of philosophy, so that the philosophy of design has become the feasible research routine about the entire develop-ment of philosophy of science and philosophy of technology. In the level of philosophical epistemology, the ontology of design is the prerequisite of the essence of design. In the level of philosophical practice theory, the essence of design is the prerequisite of the ontology of design. The cognition on design from people has developed from the level of experience to the level of theory.In the process,the design itself had formed its theory and method,and the theory and method has become the inseparable part of means and practice of design.The interactive developing process of thought and prac-tice in design is always around three categories,including "wholes and parts" and "means and ends" and "subject and object".
作者 贾林海
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期29-34,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"中国的科学建制与科学文化"(2006JDXM157)
关键词 设计哲学 设计本体论 设计方法论 基本范畴 philosophy of design ontology of design methodology of design basic category
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1C.Mitcham.Thinking Through Technology:The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy[M].Chicago,University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  • 2R.J.Smith B.R.Butler W.K.LeBold.Engineering as a Career(4th edition)[M]. New York,McGraw-Hill,1983.
  • 3乔瑞金,张秀武,刘晓东.技术设计:技术哲学研究的新论域[J].哲学动态,2008(8):66-71. 被引量:13
  • 4Peter Kroes. Foundational Issues of Engineering Design [C]. Anthonie Meijers.Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Lid, 2009.
  • 5Peter Kroes. Introduction to Part III[C].Anthonie Meijers.Phi- losophy of Technology and Engineering Ltd,2009.
  • 6Richard Buchanan.Thinking About Design:An Historical Pe- spective [C]. Anthonie Meijers.Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences.ELSEVIER Ltd,2009.
  • 7白雪海.设计方法论的哲学思考与启示[J].新建筑,2000(1):58-60. 被引量:14
  • 8梅映雪.设计哲学引论[J].河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,26(4):51-53. 被引量:8
  • 9Carl Mitcham and Adam Briggle.The Interaction of Ethics and Technology in Historical Perspective[C]. Anthonie Meijers edit.Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. EL- SEVIER Ltd, 2009.
  • 10[美]杜安·普霄布尔萨拉·普雷布尔.艺术形式[M].武坚,王睿,等译.太原:山西人民出版社,1992.

二级参考文献32

  • 1W.拉莫特,孔明安,邢怀滨.技术的文化塑造与技术多样性的政治学[J].世界哲学,2005(4):83-91. 被引量:6
  • 2陈凡,朱春艳,赵迎欢,田鹏颖,马会端.技术与设计:“经验转向”背景下的技术哲学研究——第14届国际技术哲学学会(SPT)会议述评[J].哲学动态,2006(6):68-72. 被引量:5
  • 3H. Achterhuis, American Philosophy of Technology, Indiana University Press,2001, p. 56.
  • 4Carl Mitcham, Thinking Through Technology : The Path between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994 ,p. 159.
  • 5Carl Mitcham, "The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering", Tecnos, 1998, p. 17 ; p. 45 ; p. 21.
  • 6J. C. Pitt, Thinking about Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, New York: Cambridge Press, 2000, p. 12;p. g2;p. 33.
  • 7Vinceti," The Experimental Assessment of Engineering Theory as a Tool for Design", Techne ,2001, p. 5.
  • 8Louis Bucciarelli, Designing Engineers, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1994, pp. 18 ~ 21.
  • 9Kroes, Technical Functions as Dispositions :a Critical Assessment, Techne5:3 ,Spring,2001, pp. 1 - 16.
  • 10Rothwell R, Reindustrialization and Technology Longman, 1985, p. 48.

共引文献47

同被引文献105

引证文献13

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部