期刊文献+

自酸蚀粘接流动树脂初始应用层厚度对牙本质粘接强度的影响 被引量:10

Effect of base layer thickness of a self-adhesive resin on dentin bonding strength
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究自酸蚀粘接流动树脂(DvadFlow,DF)初始应用层厚度对牙本质粘接性能的影响。方法选取离体人磨牙20颗,制备牙本质试件,将牙本质试件分为4组。G0.5、G1.0、G2.0直接使用DF,初始应用层厚度分别为0.5、1.0和2.0mm;GOB配合使用OptiBond All in One(OB)自酸蚀粘接剂后再使用DF,初始应用层厚度为2.0mm。4组上部均充填复合树脂,然后制备截面积为1mm×1mm的条形试样并测定微拉伸粘接强度,每组试样均为15个。扫描电镜观察4组牙本质-树脂界面的形态及断裂类型。结果GOB、G0.5、G1.0及G2.0组微拉伸粘接强度依次减小,分别为(20.19±3.11)、(8.65±1.58)、(6.65±1.13)及(5.70±0.60)MPa,4组间总体比较及两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。G0.5、G1.0、G2.0及GOB组粘接断裂类型为混合破坏B2型(DF自酸蚀粘树脂与牙本质混合破坏)的样本比例分别为14/15、13/15、14/15及13/15。结论直接使用DF自酸蚀粘接流动树脂,其与牙本质的粘接强度随材料初始应用层厚度增加而降低。 Objective To evaluate the effect of base layer thickness of DyadFlow(DF) self-adhesive resin on dentin bonding strength. Methods Twenty extracted intact human molars were randomly selected and the occlusal surface of each molar was prepared by removing the enamel and exposing the dentin surface. The prepared molars were divided, randomly and equally, into 4 groups. For groups G0.5, G1.0 and G2.0, DF was applied directly on the dentin surfaces following the manufacturer's instruction, and for group GOB, OptiBond All-in-One(OB) self etching adhesive was applied on the dentin surface before using DF. The base layer thickness of DF was 0.5 mm, 1.0 ram, 2.0 mm, 2.0 mm for groups G0.5, G1.0, G2.0 and GOB, respectively. Composite crown were built up on each tooth, then the samples were sectioned longitudinally into sticks with proximately 1.0 mm2 bonding area(for microtensile bond strength[MTBS] testing) or slabs (for bonding interface observation with SEM). Fifteen sticks were obtained for each group. The fracture surface was also observed using SEM and the fracture type of each specimen was determined. Results The MTBS were: GOB (20.19± 3.11) MPa 〉G0.5 (8.65±1.58) MPa〉G1.0 (6.65±1.13) MPa 〉G2.0 (5.70±0.60) MPa(P〈0.05). Bonding interface fracture B2 was most frequently observed for all groups: G0.5: 14/15, G1.0: 13/15, G2.0:14/15 and GOB: 13/15. Conclusions The MTBS decreased when the base layer thickness of DF increased. Direct application of DF self-adhesive resin on dentin surface adhesive restorations should be concerned.
出处 《中华口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期93-97,共5页 Chinese Journal of Stomatology
基金 北京市科学技术委员会科技计划(Z141100000514016)
关键词 树脂 合成 粘固作用 牙本质粘接强度 断裂类型 粘接界面 Resins, synthetic Cementation Dentin bond strength Fracture types Bonding interface
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements: chemistry, properties and clinical considerations[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2011, 38(4): 295-314. DOI:10.1111/j. 1365-2842.2010.02148.x.
  • 2Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. TEM interfacial characterization of an experimental self-adhesive filling material bonded to enamel/dentin[J]. Dent Mater, 2011, 27(8): 818-824. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.0d.007.
  • 3Blunck U, Zaslansky P. Enamel margin integrity of Class I one-bottle all-in-one adhesives-based restorations[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2011, 13(1): 23-29. DOI:10.3290/j.jad.a18445.
  • 4Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel [J]. Dent Mater, 2013, 29(2): 221-230. DOI:10.1016/j.dental. 2012.10.001.
  • 5田福聪,王晓燕,高学军.温度循环对自酸蚀粘接剂与牙本质粘接耐久性的影响[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2014,46(2):284-287. 被引量:7
  • 6于玲,王晓燕,田福聪,高学军.一步法自酸蚀粘接剂微拉伸粘接强度的研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2007,42(4):240-241. 被引量:22
  • 7E1-Askary FS, Van Noort R. Effect of air-drying pressure and distance on microtensile bond strength of a self-etching adhesive[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2011, 13(2): 147-153. DOI:10.3290/j.jad.a 18782.
  • 8Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges[J]. Oper Dent, 2003, 28(3): 215-235.
  • 9Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, et al. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives[J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(10): 1412-1419. DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.018.
  • 10E1-Damanhoury HM, Gaintantzopoulou M. Effect of rhemlocycling, segree of conversion, and cavity configuration on the bonding effectiveness of all-in-one adhesives[J]. Oper Dent, 2015, 40(5): 480-491.DOI:10.2341/14-185-LR1.

二级参考文献50

  • 1Ogden AR. Porosity in composite resins: an Achilles' heel? J Dent, 1985, 13(4) : 331-340.
  • 2McCabe JF, Ogden AR. The relationship between porosity, compressive fatigue limit and wear in composite resin restorative materials. Dent Mater, 1987, 3(1) : 9-12.
  • 3O'Brien WJ, Yee J Jr. Microstrueture of posterior restoration of composite resin after clinical wear. Oper Dent, 1980, 5 (3): 90 -94.
  • 4Tyas M J, Jones DW, Rizkalla AS. The evaluation of resin composite consistency. Dent Mater, 1998, 14(6) : 424-428.
  • 5Hansen EK, Asrnussen E. Efficacy of dentin-bonding agents in relation to application technique. Acta Odontol Scand, 1989, 47(2) : 117-120.
  • 6Huysmans MC, van der Varst PG, Lautenschlager EP, et al. The influence of simulated clinical handling on the flexural and compressive strength of posterior composite restorative materials.Dent Mater, 1996, 12(2): 116-120.
  • 7Opdam N J, Roeters JJ, Joosten M, et al. Porosities and voids in Class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syringable composite. Dent Mater, 2002, 18( 1 ) : 58-63.
  • 8Van Beetzen M, Li J, Nieander I, et al. Microhardness and porosity of Class 2 light-cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light-curing wand. Oper Dent, 1993, 18(3): 103-109.
  • 9Al-Sharaa KA, Watts D. Stickiness prior to setting of some light cured resin-composites. Dent Mater, 2003, 19(3) : 182-187.
  • 10Fano V, Ortalli I, Pozela K. Porosity in composite resins. Biomaterials, 1995, 16(17) : 1291-1295.

共引文献40

同被引文献102

引证文献10

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部