解剖钢板和克氏针内固定治疗锁骨骨折的对比研究

The Comparison of Anatomical Steel Plate and Kirschner Needle Internal Fixation in Reatment of Clavicle Fracture

目的对比分析解剖钢板和克氏针内固定治疗锁骨骨折的临床疗效。方法选取我院治疗的锁骨骨折患者100例,按照其手术方式分为解剖钢板组和克氏针组,各50例,分别行解剖钢板内固定术和克氏针内固定术进行治疗,比较两种手术方法的临床疗效及并发症。结果解剖钢板组治疗优良率显著高于克氏针组,术后并发症发生率显著低于克氏针组。结论与克氏针内固定相比,解剖钢板内固定治疗锁骨骨折更有利于骨折愈合和肩关节功能的恢复,效果显著。

Objective To compare the clinical curative effect of anatomical steel plate and kirschner needle internal fixation in reatment of clavicle fracture. Methods 100 cases with clavicle fracture in our hospital were selected and divided into anatomy steel group and kirschner needle group, 50 cases in each, anatomic plate fixation and kirschner needle fixation were operated respectively, comparing clinical curative effect and complications. Results The curative effect of anatomy steel group was significantly higher than the other, and the incidence of complications was lower than kirschner needle group. Conclusion Compared with gram needle fixation, anatomic plate internal fixation is more beneficial to fracture healing and the shoulder function recover.